Cited by 110Schizophrenia research and treatmentStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsTreatment of Major Depression

Treatment response after relapse in a placebo-controlled maintenance trial in schizophrenia

Emsley, Robin, Nuamah, Isaac, Hough, David, Gopal, Srihari·2012·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

While placebo-controlled studies continue to be required by regulatory authorities for the licensing of new drugs for schizophrenia to demonstrate maintenance of effect, the long-term risks to participants are largely unknown. We compared the response to treatment with paliperidone palmitate before and after relapse in such a study. This was a post-hoc analysis of 97 patients with schizophrenia who relapsed while receiving placebo in a multinational relapse prevention clinical trial. Patients underwent an initial open-label treatment phase of 33 weeks (comprising a 9-week transition phase to switch patients to paliperidone palmitate, a 12-week flexible-dose phase and a 12-week fixed-dose phase); a double-blind phase of variable duration during which stabilized patients were randomized 1:1 to either continue paliperidone palmitate or receive placebo; and an optional 52-week open-label flexible-dose extension phase. There was a small but significant increase in PANSS total scores after eight months of treatment following relapse (56.7[12.68]) compared with prerelapse endpoint (54.5[11.74]) (p=0.026). Fourteen of 97 (14.4%) patients who had initially responded favorably to treatment met predefined nonresponse criteria in the postrelapse treatment phase, suggesting that treatment refractoriness may evolve in a subset of patients after relapse. However, relapses occurred in 18% of patients randomized to ongoing treatment in the double-blind phase, raising the possibility that treatment failure may also evolve in patients receiving continuous treatment. These findings may help inform decisions regarding the future of placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.030

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emsley, R., Nuamah, I., Hough, D., & Gopal, S.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Emsley, Robin
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
29-34
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132729780
Cited by
110
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
schizophrenia, relapse
MeSH terms
Paliperidone Palmitate, Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Isoxazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Palmitates, Placebos, Recurrence, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review