Cited by 162Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Increasing mortality gap for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia over the last three decades—a Danish nationwide study from 1980 to 2010

Nielsen, René Ernst, Uggerby, Anne Sofie, Jensen, Signe Olrik Wallenstein, McGrath, John Joseph·2013·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to describe secular trends in the average age of death in patients with schizophrenia and to compare these with the general population.Methods This is a longitudinal linkage study from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2010 using the Danish Psychiatric Research Register and the Danish Cause of Death Register. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and survival analysis.Results The average age of death in the schizophrenia population (62.2 years; 95% CI, 61.9-62.5) was lower compared to the general population (73.4 years; 95% CI, 73.4-73.4), P<0.001. In the general population we found, for men, an average increase in the age of death of 0.28 years (95% CI, 0.27-0.28) per calendar year, and for women an increase in age of death of 0.31 years (95% CI, 0.31-0.32) per calendar year (both P<0.001). In contrast, age of death decreased in the schizophrenia population: the change in average age of death for males was 0.04 years (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.00) per calendar year (P<0.05), and the comparable estimate for females was -0.05 years (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.01) per calendar year (P<0.05). A similar pattern existed after acts of self-harm as cause of death were excluded from the analyses. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia had an increased mortality rate compared with the general population (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 2.01-2.09).Conclusions On average, patients with schizophrenia die younger than the general population, independent of intentional self-harm as cause of death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.025

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, R. E., Uggerby, A. S., Jensen, S. O. W., & McGrath, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
146
Issue
1-3
Pages
22-27
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978327383
Cited by
162
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
schizophrenia, mortality gap
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Denmark, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review