Cited by 29Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Comorbidity of chronic somatic diseases in patients with psychotic disorders and their influence on 4-year outcomes of integrated care treatment (ACCESS II study)

Lambert, Martin, Ruppelt, Friederike, Siem, Anna-Katharina, Rohenkohl, Anja Christine, Kraft, Vivien, Luedecke, Daniel, Sengutta, Mary, Schröter, Romy +6 more·2018·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background People with psychotic disorders fulfilling criteria of a severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) display a high risk of somatic comorbidity (SC). Methods ACCESS II is a prospective, long-term study examining the effectiveness of Integrated Care for people with psychotic disorders fulfilling SPMI criteria. Chronic comorbid somatic disorders were systematically assessed according to ICD-10-GM criteria. Patients treated for ≥4years in ACCESS were categorized as early psychosis (treatment: ≤2years) or non-early psychosis (treatment: >2years) patients. Results Of 187 patients treated in ACCESS for ≥4years (mean age=41.8years, males=44.4%), 145 (77.5%) had SC, (mean=2.1±2.1). Overall, 55 different diseases from 15 different ICD-10-GM disease areas were identified. Prevalence of ≥1 SC (p=0.09) and specific types of SC (p=0.08-1.00) did not differ between early and non-early psychosis patients, but non-early psychosis patients had a higher mean number of SC (2.3±2.2 vs. 1.3±1.3, p=0.002). SC patients had higher rates of comorbid mental disorders (93% vs. 81%, p=0.002), specifically posttraumatic stress disorder (23% vs. 7%, p=0.002), and suicide attempts (43% vs. 19%, p Conclusions SC is frequent in patients with severe psychotic disorders, even in the early psychosis phase. The magnitude of the problem underlines the need for regular screening, comprehensive assessment, preventive pharmacotherapy, and targeted SC management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.036

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, M., Ruppelt, F., Siem, A.-K., Rohenkohl, A. C., Kraft, V., Luedecke, D., Sengutta, M., Schröter, R., Daubmann, A., Correll, C. U., Gallinat, J., Karow, A., Wiedemann, K., & Schöttle, D.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Zucker Hillside Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lambert, Martin
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
193
Pages
377-383
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741887270
Cited by
29
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
somatic comorbidity, psychosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Somatoform Disorders, Comorbidity, International Classification of Diseases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review