Cited by 80Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPesticide Exposure and Toxicity

Persistent organic pollutants and pregnancy complications

Open access
Smarr, Melissa M., Grantz, Katherine L., Zhang, Cuilin, Sundaram, Rajeshwari, Maisog, José M., Barr, Dana Boyd, Louis, Germaine M. Buck·2016·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

We sought to investigate the relationship between maternal preconception exposures to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and pregnancy complications, gestational diabetes (GDM) and gestational hypertension. Data from 258 (51%) women with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) confirmed pregnancies reaching ≥24weeks gestation, from a prospective cohort of 501 couples who discontinued contraception to attempt pregnancy, were analyzed. Preconception concentrations of 9 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and 10 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were quantified in serum. In separate multiple logistic regression models of self-reported physician diagnosed outcomes: GDM (11%) and gestational hypertension (10%), chemicals were natural log-transformed and rescaled by their standard deviation (SD). Models were adjusted for serum lipids, and then adjusted for age, body mass index, race, and smoking. Models were additionally adjusted for the sum of the remaining POPs in each chemical class. Women's serum concentration of PBDE congener 153 (PBDE-153) was positively associated with an increased odds of GDM per SD increase in log-transformed concentration, for unadjusted (OR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.02-1.81), a priori adjusted (OR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.03-1.86) and with the sum of remaining PBDEs (OR=1.79, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.74) models. Our findings suggest that at environmentally relevant concentrations, maternal exposure to POPs prior to conception may contribute to increased chance of developing GDM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.030

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some environmental factors, such as passive smoking and exposure to persistent organic pollutants or endocrine disruptors, might contribute to an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus.

    “Some environmental factors, such as passive smoking156 and exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POP) or endocrine disruptors158,159, might contribute to an increased risk of developing GDM.”
  • Environmental factors such as indoor air pollution, passive smoking, POPs and endocrine disruptors might contribute to increased risk of HDP or GDM in pregnancy.

    “Given that environmental factors such as indoor air pollution168, passive smoking156, POPs, and endocrine disruptors158,159 might contribute to an increased risk of developing either HDP or GDM in pregnancy”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smarr, M. M., Grantz, K. L., Zhang, C., Sundaram, R., Maisog, J. M., Barr, D. B., & Louis, G. M. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Smarr, Melissa M.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
551-552
Pages
285-291
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2267762287
Cited by
80
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Intramural Research Program of the NICHD (N01-HD-3-3355, N01-HD-3-3356, NOH-HD-3-3358)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
persistent organic pollutants, pregnancy complications, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, organochlorine pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, preconception exposure, maternal serum concentrations, environmental endocrine disruptors
MeSH terms
Adult, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Humans, Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated, Pesticides, Polybrominated Biphenyls, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Maternal Exposure, Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review