Cited by 135Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

A prospective study of prepregnancy serum concentrations of perfluorochemicals and the risk of gestational diabetes

Open access
Zhang, Cuilin, Sundaram, Rajeshwari, Maisog, José, Calafat, Antonia M., Barr, Dana Boyd, Buck Louis, Germaine M.·2015·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To examine preconception serum concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and six other PFCs in relation to gestational diabetes (GDM) risk.Design Prospective cohort with longitudinal follow-up.Setting Not applicable.Patient(s) Among 501 women recruited upon discontinuing contraception for the purpose of becoming pregnant, 258 (51%) became pregnant and were eligible for the study, of which 28 (11%) reported having physician-diagnosed GDM during follow-up.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of GDM associated with each standard deviation (SD) increment of preconception serum PFOA concentration (ng/mL, log-transformed) and six other PFCs were estimated with the use of logistic regression after adjusting for age, prepregnancy body mass index, smoking, and parity conditional on gravidity.Result(s) Preconception geometric mean (95% CI) PFOA concentrations (in ng/mL) were higher for women with than without GDM (3.94 [3.15-4.93] vs. 3.07 [2.83-3.12], respectively). Each SD increment in PFOA was associated with a 1.87-fold increased GDM risk (adjusted OR 1.86 [95% CI 1.14-3.02]). A slightly increased risk associated with each SD increment for the six other PFCs was observed as well (all ORs >1.0, range 1.06-1.27), although the associations were not statistically significant.Conclusion(s) Our findings suggested that higher environmentally relevant concentrations of PFOA were significantly associated with an increased risk of GDM. If corroborated, these findings may be suggestive of a possible environmental etiology for GDM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.001

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some environmental factors, such as passive smoking and exposure to persistent organic pollutants or endocrine disruptors, might contribute to an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus.

    “Some environmental factors, such as passive smoking156 and exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POP) or endocrine disruptors158,159, might contribute to an increased risk of developing GDM.”
  • Environmental factors such as indoor air pollution, passive smoking, POPs and endocrine disruptors might contribute to increased risk of HDP or GDM in pregnancy.

    “Given that environmental factors such as indoor air pollution168, passive smoking156, POPs, and endocrine disruptors158,159 might contribute to an increased risk of developing either HDP or GDM in pregnancy”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Sundaram, R., Maisog, J., Calafat, A. M., Barr, D. B., & Buck Louis, G. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Cuilin
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
184-189
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981158609
Cited by
135
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99HD999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (N0HHD-3-3358)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (N01-HD-3–3356, N01-HD-3–3355)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (N01‐HD‐3–3355, N01-HD-3–3356, NOH-HD-3-3358, ZIAHD008889, ZIAHD008770)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorocarbons, gestational diabetes mellitus, environmental exposure, endocrine disruptors, women of reproductive age
MeSH terms
Adult, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Michigan, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Texas, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review