The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source and potential risk assessment of suspended atmospheric microplastics in Shanghai
Abstract
A growing body of research has recently revealed that airborne microplastics could be an important source of microplastic pollution in marine environments. However, the origins and spatial distributions of suspended atmospheric microplastics (SAMPs) are poorly understood. Further, SAMPs abundances have only been observed using passive sampling devices that could lead to underestimates of abundances. To address these knowledge-gaps, the current study investigated the potential source and spatial distribution of SAMPs in Shanghai during May 2018 using an active suspended particulate sampler. SAMPs abundances from filtered air ranged from 0 to 4.18 n/m3 (items per cubic meter of air). Microfibers comprised 67% of all SAMPs, followed by fragments and granules comprising 30% and 3% of SAMPs, respectively. μ-FT-IR analysis revealed that the SAMPs consisted of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), polyester (PES), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), poly(N-methyl acrylamide) (PAA), rayon (RY), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), epoxy resin (EP), and alkyd resin (ALK). Synthetic compounds comprised 54% of the observed particles, of which PET, PE, PES, PAN, PAA, and RY comprised 91% of the microplastics. Our preliminary evaluation indicated that textile clothes are likely major source of the airborne microplastics. Modeling estimated that approximately 120.7 kg of SAMPs are annually transported through Shanghai air. Moreover, an estimation of the ecological risk from SAMPs indicated that a minor ecological consequence was present, necessitating further evaluation of SAMPs pollution. In addition, modeling estimated that approximately 21 particles of microplastics are inhaled daily by people in Shanghai from outdoor environments. Given the prevalence of airborne microfibers, it is critically urgent to reevaluate procedures for sampling, transporting, and processing microplastic field samples. Future investigations should seek to develop more rigorous and conclusive methods to evaluate these types of samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Physical Impacts of Microplastics on Marine Organisms: A Review
Wright, S. L., Thompson, R. C., & Galloway, T. S. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031 · Cited by 4,524
Lithner, D., Larsson, Å., & Dave, G. (2011) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.038 · Cited by 2,684
Lusher, A. L., McHugh, M., & Thompson, R. C. (2013) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.028 · Cited by 2,075
Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments
Van Cauwenberghe, L., Vanreusel, A., Mees, J., & Janssen, C. R. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.013 · Cited by 1,575
Song, Y. K., Hong, S. H., Jang, M., Han, G. M., Jung, S. W., & Shim, W. J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b06155 · Cited by 1,568
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es504525u · Cited by 1,308
Spatial patterns of plastic debris along estuarine shorelines
Browne, M. A., Galloway, T. S., & Thompson, R. C. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903784e · Cited by 1,246
Jeong, C.-B., Won, E.-J., Kang, H.-M., Lee, M.-C., Hwang, D.-S., Hwang, U.-K., Zhou, B., Souissi, S., Lee, S.-J., & Lee, J.-S. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01441 · Cited by 1,233
Lusher, A. L., Tirelli, V., O’Connor, I., & Officer, R. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14947 · Cited by 1,170
Cai, L., Wang, J., Peng, J., Wu, Z., & Tan, X. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.079 · Cited by 575
Cited by
Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy
Jenner, L. C., Rotchell, J. M., Bennett, R. T., Cowen, M., Tentzeris, V., & Sadofsky, L. R. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154907 · Cited by 1,536
Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue
Amato-Lourenço, L. F., Carvalho-Oliveira, R., Júnior, G. R., dos Santos Galvão, L., Ando, R. A., & Mauad, T. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126124 · Cited by 1,329
Source, migration and toxicology of microplastics in soil
Guo, J.-J., Huang, X.-P., Xiang, L., Wang, Y.-Z., Li, Y.-W., Li, H., Cai, Q.-Y., Mo, C.-H., & Wong, M.-H. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105263 · Cited by 1,211
A review of microplastics in table salt, drinking water, and air: direct human exposure
Zhang, Q., Xu, E. G., Li, J., Chen, Q., Ma, L., Zeng, E. Y., & Shi, H. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04535 · Cited by 1,064
Adsorption behavior of organic pollutants on microplastics
Fu, L., Li, J., Wang, G., Luan, Y., & Dai, W. (2021) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112207 · Cited by 932
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K., Wang, X., Fang, T., Xu, P., Zhu, L., & Li, D.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 675
- Pages
- 462-471
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2937567928
- Cited by
- 979
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 23.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
