Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies

Danish, Ulucak, Recep·2020·Science of The Total Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Green growth has become one of the best alternative strategies for sustainable development. Although environmental technologies play a fundamental role in green growth, further investigations are required to understand whether and how environmental technologies affect green growth. Therefore, this study explores the role of environmental technologies in green growth by controlling renewable and non-renewable energy consumption for BRICS countries. To this end, the study conducts advanced panel data estimation techniques that produce robust results against endogeneity, heteroskedasticity, and cross-sectional dependence issues. Empirical results show that environmental-related technologies positively contribute to green growth. Results also confirm that renewable energy promotes green growth, but non-renewable energy is detrimental to green growth. BRICS countries need to improve innovations in the energy sector for achieving green growth and sustainability targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kwon, 2017, Comparison of technology ef fi ciency for CO 2 emissions reduction among European countries based on DEA with decomposed factors, J. Clean. Prod., 151, 109, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.065 · DOI
  2. Mensah, 2019, Innovation and CO2 emissions: the complimentary role of eco-patent and trademark in the OECD economies, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 10.1007/s11356-019-05558-4 · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05558-4
  3. Nikzad, 2017, Greenhouse gas emissions and green technologies in Canada, Environ. Dev., 24, 99, 10.1016/j.envdev.2017.01.001 · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2017.01.001
  4. Silva, 2013, Economic and environmental effects under resource scarcity and substitution between renewable and non-renewable resources, Energy Policy, 54, 113, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.069 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.069

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Danish, & Ulucak, R.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
712
Pages
136504
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504
OpenAlex
W2999715279
Cited by
473
References
53
FWCI
59.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504
The paper
Danish, & Ulucak, R. (2020). How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.