Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 615

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 280 of the 280 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: A review

Open access
Baskar, Arun V., Bolan, Nanthi, Hoang, Son A., Sooriyakumar, Prasanthi, Kumar, Manish, Singh, Lal, Jasemizad, Tahereh, Padhye, Lokesh P., Singh, Gurwinder, Vinu, Ajayan, Sarkar, Binoy, Kirkham, M.B., Rinklebe, Jörg, Wang, Shengsen, Wang, Hailong, Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar, Siddique, Kadambot H.M.·2022·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Adsorption is the most widely adopted, effective, and reliable treatment process for the removal of inorganic and organic contaminants from wastewater. One of the major issues with the adsorption-treatment process for the removal of contaminants from wastewater streams is the recovery and sustainable management of spent adsorbents. This review focuses on the effectiveness of emerging adsorbents and how the spent adsorbents could be recovered, regenerated, and further managed through reuse or safe disposal. The critical analysis of both conventional and emerging adsorbents on organic and inorganic contaminants in wastewater systems are evaluated. The various recovery and regeneration techniques of spent adsorbents including magnetic separation, filtration, thermal desorption and decomposition, chemical desorption, supercritical fluid desorption, advanced oxidation process and microbial assisted adsorbent regeneration are discussed in detail. The current challenges for the recovery and regeneration of adsorbents and the methodologies used for solving those problems are covered. The spent adsorbents are managed through regeneration for reuse (such as soil amendment, capacitor, catalyst/catalyst support) or safe disposal involving incineration and landfilling. Sustainable management of spent adsorbents, including processes involved in the recovery and regeneration of adsorbents for reuse, is examined in the context of resource recovery and circular economy. Finally, the review ends with the current drawbacks in the recovery and management of the spent adsorbents and the future directions for the economic and environmental feasibility of the system for industrial-scale application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153555

Cites

280 of 280 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 280 references

Cited by

See all 615

Metadata

Authors
Baskar, A. V., Bolan, N., Hoang, S. A., Sooriyakumar, P., Kumar, M., Singh, L., Jasemizad, T., Padhye, L. P., Singh, G., Vinu, A., Sarkar, B., Kirkham, M. B., Rinklebe, J., Wang, S., Wang, H., Balasubramanian, R., & Siddique, K. H. M.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
822
Pages
153555
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210576962
Cited by
615
References
280
FWCI
34.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153555
The paper
Baskar, A. V., Bolan, N., Hoang, S. A., Sooriyakumar, P., Kumar, M., Singh, L., Jasemizad, T., Padhye, L. P., Singh, G., Vinu, A., Sarkar, B., Kirkham, M. B., Rinklebe, J., Wang, S., Wang, H., Balasubramanian, R., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2022). Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: A review. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153555

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.