Cited by 102Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon capture and utilization by algae with high concentration CO2 or bicarbonate as carbon source

Yang, Yi, Tang, Shuo, Chen, J. Paul·2024·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Algae plays a key role in carbon capture and utilization (CCU) as it can capture and use the atmospheric CO 2 for conversion of value-added products. Concentrated CO 2 is common in flue gas and provides opportunities for algae cultivation. The drawbacks are mass transfer limitation, poor CO 2 dissolution, and challenges to reach optimal levels for algal growth at given flue gas levels. Bicarbonate is flexible to be used as carbon source and owns the potential to enhance the efficiency of biological carbon fixation by algae. The requirements of algae strains are more stringent. To improve the industrial scale-up of CCU, system optimization is of great importance. More novel algal strains that can grow rapidly under harsh environment and provide valuable bio-products should be developed for large-scale production. Algae-driven CCU is promising for achieving carbon-neutrality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170325

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alami, 2020, General concepts, mechanical energy storage for renewable and sustainable energy, resources, 13
  2. Ataeian, 2019, vol. 116, 1604
  3. Price, 2008, Advances in understanding the cyanobacterial CO2-concentrating-mechanism (CCM): functional components, Ci transporters, diversity, genetic regulation and prospects for engineering into plants, J Exp Bot, 59, 1441

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 102

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Y., Tang, S., & Chen, J. P.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, J. Paul
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
918
Pages
170325
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391180035
Cited by
100
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 22
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
carbon capture and utilization, algae, flue gas, bicarbonate, algae cultivation, mass transfer limitations, CO2 dissolution, industrial scale-up, carbon neutrality, bioproducts
MeSH terms
Bicarbonates, Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Plants, Biomass, Carbon Cycle, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review