Cited by 84Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Efficient CO2 capture from the air for high microalgal biomass production by a bicarbonate Pool

Zhu, Chenba, Zhai, Xiaoqian, Xi, Yimei, Wang, Jinghan, Kong, Fantao, Zhao, Yunpeng, Chi, Zhanyou·2020·Journal of CO2 Utilization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.12.023

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, C., Zhai, X., Xi, Y., Wang, J., Kong, F., Zhao, Y., & Chi, Z.
Affiliations
Dalian University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Chi, Zhanyou
Venue
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
37
Pages
320-327
ISSN
2212-9820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000441222
Cited by
84
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of CO2 Utilization (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
direct air capture, CO2 capture, microalgae cultivation, adsorbent regeneration, photosynthesis, pH effect, bicarbonate concentration, renewable energy, wave energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review