Cited by 34Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisAnalytical chemistry methods development

Wastewater-Based Monitoring of the Nitazene Analogues: First Detection of Protonitazene in Wastewater

Open access
Bade, Richard, Nadarajan, Dhayaalini, Driver, Erin M., Halden, Rolf U., Gerber, Cobus, Krotulski, Alex, Hall, Wayne, Mueller, Jochen F.·2024·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Synthetic opioids, particularly the nitazene analogues class, have become a public health concern due to their high potency. Wastewater-based epidemiology can detect community use of these compounds. The objective of this work was to detect nitazene analogues in wastewater from samples collected from eight sites in the United States. Influent wastewater samples were collected from eight sites in seven states (Arizona, Oregon, New Mexico, Illinois, New Jersey, Washington and Georgia) in the United States. Samples were collected from each site on three days between 27 December 2022 and 4 January 2023, acidified on collection, stored frozen and shipped to Arizona State University (Tempe, AZ) for sample processing. Samples were then shipped to The University of Queensland (Brisbane, Australia) for sample analysis. Protonitazene was found in samples collected from two sites in Washington and Illinois. The concentration was estimated up to 0.5 ng/L, with estimated excreted mass loads up to 0.3 mg/day/1000 people. This work has shown that it is possible to detect nitazene analogues in wastewater using a combination of sample pre-concentration and sensitive instrumentation, thereby further expanding the utility of wastewater-based epidemiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170781

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bade, R., Nadarajan, D., Driver, E. M., Halden, R. U., Gerber, C., Krotulski, A., Hall, W., & Mueller, J. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Arizona State University Foundation for A New American University (US)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Fredric Rieders Family Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Bade, Richard
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
920
Pages
170781
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391774882
Cited by
33
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Queensland
  • J M Kaplan Fund
  • Australian Research Council (DE220100381, FL200100028)
  • Queensland Health
  • Arizona State University Foundation
  • Arizona State University
  • Australian Government (30009070)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
synthetic opioids, wastewater-based epidemiology, wastewater surveillance, illicit drug use, sample pre-concentration, emerging contaminants
MeSH terms
Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Monitoring, Arizona, Australia, Humans, Illicit Drugs, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review