Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High entropy oxides: The role of entropy, enthalpy and synergy

Sarkar, Abhishek, Breitung, Ben, Hahn, Horst·2020·Scripta Materialia

Abstract

Abstract This viewpoint article focuses on some of the important issues related to the emerging field of high entropy oxides (HEOs). Open queries regarding the role of entropy, enthalpy, individual elements and synergy arising from the presence of multiple elements in HEOs are discussed. In addition, a brief overview of the current state of research on HEOs is provided. Finally, we share our views on the uniqueness of HEOs by describing some features, which distinguish them from the conventional oxides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.019

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Sarkar, A., Breitung, B., & Hahn, H.
Venue
Scripta Materialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
187
Pages
43-48
ISSN
1359-6462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035708369
Cited by
389
References
57
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.