Cited by 41Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEpilepsy research and treatmentPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Anxiety and depression in people with epilepsy: The contribution of metacognitive beliefs

Open access
Fisher, Peter L., Noble, Adam J.·2017·Seizure

Abstract

Purpose Anxiety and depressive disorders frequently occur in people with epilepsy (PWE). An information processing model of psychopathology, the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model specifies that maladaptive metacognitive beliefs and processes play a fundamental role in the development and maintenance of anxiety and depression. This study explored whether metacognitive beliefs would explain additional variance in anxiety and depression after accounting for demographics, physical and/or psychiatric illnesses, epilepsy characteristics and medication issues. The mediational relationships between metacognitive beliefs, worry and anxiety and depression, predicted by the metacognitive model were also explored, METHODS: Three hundred and forty-nine PWE participated in an online survey and completed self-report questionnaires measuring anxiety, depression, metacognitive beliefs and worry. Participants also provided information on epilepsy characteristics, demographics, comorbid physical and/or psychiatric illnesses, number of, and perceived side effects of, anti-epileptic medication.Results Regression analysis showed that metacognitive beliefs were associated with symptoms of anxiety, depression, and explained additional variance in these outcomes after accounting for the control variables. Furthermore, the fundamental tenet of the metacognitive model was supported; the relationship between negative metacognitive beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of worry and anxious and depressive symptoms was partially mediated by worry.Conclusion This is the first study to demonstrate that metacognitive beliefs and processes contribute to anxiety and depression beyond variables often associated with emotional distress in PWE. Further research is required to test if modification of metacognitive beliefs and processes using metacognitive therapy would effectively alleviate anxiety and depression in PWE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.06.012

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten of the thirteen included papers conducted hierarchical regressions evaluating which metacognitive beliefs subscales were independent predictors of anxiety, depression, and/or overall distress.

    “Ten of the thirteen included papers [41, 45–47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 58, 61] conducted hierarchical regressions evaluating which metacognitive beliefs subscales were independent predictors of anxiety, depression, and/or overall distress.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fisher, P. L., & Noble, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Peter L.
Venue
Seizure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
50
Pages
153-159
ISSN
1059-1311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2649901218
Cited by
41
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seizure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Epilepsy Action
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
epilepsy, anxiety, depression, metacognitive beliefs, worry, Self-Regulatory Executive Function model, metacognition, mediation, metacognitive therapy, psychiatric comorbidity
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Anxiety, Depression, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review