Cited by 43Infant Health and DevelopmentSleep and related disordersPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The Possums Infant Sleep Program: parents’ perspectives on a novel parent-infant sleep intervention in Australia

Open access
Ball, Helen L., Douglas, Pamela S., Kulasinghe, Kavindri, Whittingham, Koa, Hill, Peter·2018·Sleep Health

Abstract

Aim To evaluate parental perspectives on the acceptability and usefulness of a 'cued-care' approach to infant sleep implemented in an Australian primary care setting. The Possums Infant Sleep Program aims to empower parents to better understand their infant's sleep and their responses to it, and optimize healthy function of the infant's biological sleep regulators to protect against excessive night-waking.Methods The evaluation was undertaken by an independent infant sleep researcher, with no previous involvement in the Possums program. Parents' experiences of the sleep intervention were captured using a mixed methods approach involving (a) group discussions of sleep issues between parents and clinic staff, (b) discussions with parents who volunteered to provide face-to-face feedback, and (c) an online survey designed in light of the information gained from a and b. A one-year audit of clinic registrations provided contextual data.Results Sixty-four clinic clients fully (45) or partially (19) provided answers to survey questions. Respondents were primarily mothers, mean age 34, with a postgraduate qualification and high family income. Their term infants were predominantly breastfed and attended the clinic for feeding and/or sleeping difficulties across the first year of life. Almost all embraced the Possums approach, describing it as challenging and life changing. Audit data confirmed the survey sample reflected the general clinic population.Conclusions The Possums Infant Sleep Program was acceptable to parents, and highly valued. Recipients reported reduced stress, less concern about perceived sleep problems (frequent night-waking, short-day-time naps, delayed sleep onset), and better quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.08.007

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PSP is intended to educate parents in basic sleep science and how this relates to their infant's sleep development, offers strategies for optimising healthy function of the biological sleep regulators, supports values-clarification and empowers parents to adjust expectations and experiment with meeting babies' needs, and supports cued care according to neuroscience and psychological attachment

    “The program is intended to educate parents in basic sleep science and how this relates to their infant’s sleep development. It offers strategies for optimising healthy function of the biological sleep regulators, to protect against excessive night-waking. It supports values-clarification and empowers parents to adjust their expectations and to experiment with how they might meet their babies’”
  • The theoretical basis for the PSP is based on an evolutionary understanding of infant needs, integrating interdisciplinary sleep science and contextual behavioural science.

    “Whittingham & Douglas [31] published the theoretical frame for a paradigm shift in parent-baby sleep management, based on an evolutionary understanding of infant needs, and integrating interdisciplinary sleep science and contextual behavioural science (a ‘third wave’ behaviourism].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, H. L., Douglas, P. S., Kulasinghe, K., Whittingham, K., & Hill, P.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Ball, Helen L.
Venue
Sleep Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
519-526
ISSN
2352-7218 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895451357
Cited by
43
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I030123/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
infant sleep, parental attitudes, acceptability, nocturnal awakenings, primary care, parent stress, quality of life, breastfeeding, sleep onset delay, NAP
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review