The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The special features of sport: A critical revisit
Abstract
In the world of contemporary sport it is commonly claimed that at its elite end at least, sport's management is complex because the product it delivers to participants and fans is so idiosyncratic. This claim is accompanied by the view that while professional sport is in large part just another form of business, it has a range of special features that demand a customised set of practices to ensure its effective operation. This article aims to re-examine this view in the light of sport's commercial and socio-cultural developments over the last decade. It initially proposes that while both business and sport are concerned with widening market share, building profits, and strengthening brands, the presumption that sport has a monopoly over the delivery of intense emotional experiences, tribal belonging, and strong interpersonal relationships, is difficult to defend. The article concludes that while sport's economic and social progress has created an industry that is built around complex bureaucracies that turn over many thousands of millions of dollars every year, it has also created a more diverse and heterogeneous system of structures and experiences that are difficult to conflate to a handful of neat special features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2000) · Organizational Identity · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,487
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology.
Rose, A., & Tajfel, H. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066820 · Cited by 4,110
(2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475 · Cited by 2,987
(2019) · Sport Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.32731/smq · Cited by 2,512
Joseph Pine, B., & Gilmore, J. H. (2012) · Reinventing the Museum · doi:10.5040/9798216437253.ch-014 · Cited by 1,886
Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty
Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00057884 · Cited by 1,654
Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers’ Identity Narratives
Ahuvia, A. C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/429607 · Cited by 1,276
Cited by
Newman, J. I. (2014) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2012-0159 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, A. C. T., & Stewart, B.
- Venue
- Sport Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1441-3523 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2022872787
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 20.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The special features of sport: A critical revisit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.smr.2009.07.002
- The paper
- Smith, A. C. T., & Stewart, B. (2010). The special features of sport: A critical revisit. Sport Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.