Cited by 335School Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and Education

Schools as social complex adaptive systems: A new way to understand the challenges of introducing the health promoting schools concept

Keshavarz, Nastaran, Nutbeam, Don, Rowling, Louise, Khavarpour, Freidoon·2010·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Achieving system-wide implementation of health promotion programs in schools and sustaining both the program and its health related benefits have proved challenging. This paper reports on a qualitative study examining the implementation of health promoting schools programs in primary schools in Sydney, Australia. It draw upon insights from systems science to examine the relevance and usefulness of the concept of "complex adaptive systems" as a framework to better understand ways in which health promoting school interventions could be introduced and sustained. The primary data for the study were collected by semi-structured interviews with 26 school principals and teachers. Additional information was extracted from publicly available school management plans and annual reports. We examined the data from these sources to determine whether schools exhibit characteristics of complex adaptive systems. The results confirmed that schools do exhibit most, but not all of the characteristics of social complex adaptive systems, and exhibit significant differences with artificial and natural systems. Understanding schools as social complex adaptive systems may help to explain some of the challenges of introducing and sustaining change in schools. These insights may, in turn, lead us to adopt more sophisticated approaches to the diffusion of new programs in school systems that account for the diverse, complex and context specific nature of individual school systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.034

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keshavarz, N., Nutbeam, D., Rowling, L., & Khavarpour, F.
Affiliations
  • Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Keshavarz, Nastaran
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
1467-1474
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154037039
Cited by
335
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
24.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
health promoting schools, complex adaptive systems, school implementation, program sustainability, elementary school, school principals, teachers, systems science, diffusion of innovations, school change, school health promotion
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, New South Wales, Schools, Social Change, Social Conditions, Social Environment, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review