Cited by 534Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Systems and PracticesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems

Paina, L., Peters, D. H.·2012·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Despite increased prominence and funding of global health initiatives, efforts to scale up health services in developing countries are falling short of the expectations of the Millennium Development Goals. Arguing that the dominant assumptions for scaling up are inadequate, we propose that interpreting change in health systems through the lens of complex adaptive systems (CAS) provides better models of pathways for scaling up. Based on an understanding of CAS behaviours, we describe how phenomena such as path dependence, feedback loops, scale-free networks, emergent behaviour and phase transitions can uncover relevant lessons for the design and implementation of health policy and programmes in the context of scaling up health services. The implications include paying more attention to local context, incentives and institutions, as well as anticipating certain types of unintended consequences that can undermine scaling up efforts, and developing and implementing programmes that engage key actors through transparent use of data for ongoing problem-solving and adaptation. We propose that future efforts to scale up should adapt and apply the models and methodologies which have been used in other fields that study CAS, yet are underused in public health. This can help policy makers, planners, implementers and researchers to explore different and innovative approaches for reaching populations in need with effective, equitable and efficient health services. The old assumptions have led to disappointed expectations about how to scale up health services, and offer little insight on how to scale up effective interventions in the future. The alternative perspectives offered by CAS may better reflect the complex and changing nature of health systems, and create new opportunities for understanding and scaling up health services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czr054

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Little is known about scaling-up initiatives in Indigenous contexts with diverse traditions, governance structures and relationships that influence readiness and capacity for community food actions.

    “Little is known about scaling-up initiatives in Indigenous contexts with diverse traditions, governance structures and relationships that influence readiness and capacity for community food actions [23, 24].”
  • There are multiple implementation strategies that, in specific circumstances, can effectively address different barriers to implementation, as well as the same barrier.

    “That is, there are multiple implementation strategies that, in specific circumstances can effectively address different barriers to implementation, as well as the same barrier (e.g., financing) [83–85].”
  • Simple rules offer a means of understanding the emergent behaviour of healthcare organisations, professionals and patients.

    “These offer a means of understanding the emergent behaviour of healthcare organisations, professionals and patients [76–79].”

    From Implementation, context and complexity (2016) · cites this paper as [76]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paina, L., & Peters, D. H.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Peters, D. H.
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2011-08-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
365-373
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W2143926494
Cited by
534
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
40.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
scaling up health services, complex adaptive systems, health systems change, path dependence, feedback loops, scale-free networks, emergent behavior, phase transitions, health policy design, Millennium Development Goals, unintended consequences, local context, data-driven problem solving
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Health Plan Implementation, Health Planning, Health Services Needs and Demand, Organizational Objectives, Systems Theory, United Nations, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review