Cited by 22COVID-19 and Mental HealthPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDisaster Response and Management

The impact of providing end-of-life care during a pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of health and social care staff: Systematic review and meta-synthesis

Open access
Porter, Bryony, Zile, Amy, Peryer, Guy, Farquhar, Morag, Sanderson, Kristy·2021·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Background Disease outbreaks and disasters can result in excess deaths and severe disruption of usual end-of-life care processes. We aimed to: i) synthesise evidence describing the experiences of health and social care staff providing end-of-life care during a disease outbreak or humanitarian disaster, ii) understand the impact on their mental health and wellbeing and, iii) identify means of support.Methods A systematic review with meta-synthesis was conducted including studies of health and social care staff providing end-of-life care during disease outbreaks (Ebola, COVID-19, SARs, MERs) or humanitarian disasters (2001-2020). MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and grey literature databases were searched systematically, with forward and backward citation searching of included studies. Any research study designs, in any care settings, were included. Study quality was assessed using an appraisal tool relevant to each study design. Qualitative meta-synthesis was used to analyse the findings, which were then reported narratively. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020181444.Results Nineteen studies were included, including 10 Ebola studies and two COVID-19 studies. The analysis generated two superordinate themes: individual experience and organisational responsibilities. Individual experience comprised four themes: dignity in death, positive experiences, negative experience and support for staff. Organisational responsibilities comprised four themes: preparation, adaption, resources, and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).Discussion No studies quantitively measured the impact of providing end-of-life care on staff mental health and wellbeing, however qualitative studies described experiences in varied settings. Serious disease outbreaks and disasters can expose care staff to abnormally high levels of mortality and suffering. Health and social care systems need to proactively prepare for future events and enable peer support mechanisms that may help mitigate experiences of psychological distress in humanitarian crises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114397

Cites

65 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The Johanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses vol. 2 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porter, B., Zile, A., Peryer, G., Farquhar, M., & Sanderson, K.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Porter, Bryony
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
287
Pages
114397
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200170607
Cited by
22
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
Keywords
end-of-life care, health and social care staff, mental health, well-being, outbreak, humanitarian crisis, Ebola, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS, MERS, personal protective equipment, peer support, psychological distress, organizational support
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Mental Health, Social Support, Terminal Care, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review