Cited by 235Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologySoil and Environmental Studies

Degradability of black carbon and its impact on trace gas fluxes and carbon turnover in paddy soils

Knoblauch, Christian, Maarifat, Arina-Ann, Pfeiffer, Eva-Maria, Haefele, Stephan M.·2011·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Rice paddy soils are characterized by anoxic conditions, anaerobic carbon turnover, and significant emissions of the greenhouse gas methane. A main source for soil organic matter in paddy fields is the rice crop residue that is returned to fields if not burned. We investigated as an alternative treatment the amendment of rice paddies with rice residues that have been charred to black carbon. This treatment might avoid various negative side effects of traditional rice residue treatments. Although charred biomass is seen as almost recalcitrant, its impact on trace gas (CO₂, CH₄) production and emissions in paddy fields has not been studied. We quantified the degradation of black carbon produced from rice husks in four wetland soils in laboratory incubations. In two of the studied soils the addition of carbonised rice husks resulted in a transient increase in carbon mineralisation rates in comparison to control soils without organic matter addition. After almost three years, between 4.4% and 8.5% of the black carbon added was mineralised to CO₂ under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively. The addition of untreated rice husks resulted in a strong increase in carbon mineralisation rates and in the same time period 77%–100% of the added rice husks were mineralised aerobically and 31%–54% anaerobically. The ¹³C-signatures of respired CO₂ gave a direct indication of black carbon mineralisation to CO₂. In field trials we quantified the impact of rice husk black carbon or untreated rice husks on soil respiration and methane emissions. The application of black carbon had no significant effect on soil respiration but significantly enhanced methane emissions in the first rice crop season. The additional methane released accounted for only 0.14% of black carbon added. If the same amount of organic carbon was added as untreated rice husks, 34% of the applied carbon was released as CO₂ and methane in the first season. Furthermore, the addition of fresh harvest residues to paddy fields resulted in a disproportionally high increase in methane emissions. Estimating the carbon budget of the different rice crop residue treatments indicated that charring of rice residues and adding the obtained black carbon to paddy fields instead of incorporating untreated harvest residues may reduce field methane emissions by as much as 80%. Hence, the production of black carbon from rice harvest residues could be a powerful strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.012

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addition of biochar to soils results in slower mineralisation of the biochar materials than the uncharred biomass.

    “Addition of biochar to soils has been shown to result in slower mineralisation of the biochar materials than the uncharred biomass [69]”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knoblauch, C., Maarifat, A.-A., Pfeiffer, E.-M., & Haefele, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • International Rice Research Institute (PH)
Corresponding author
Knoblauch, Christian
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1768-1778
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071154927
Cited by
235
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Atomic Energy Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
black carbon, rice husk biochar, rice residue management, paddy soil, methane emissions, soil respiration, carbon mineralization, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, 13C labeling, carbon balance, wetland soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review