Cited by 73Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermal and Kinetic Analysis

The production of engineered biochars in a vertical auger pyrolysis reactor for carbon sequestration

Open access
Brassard, Patrick, Godbout, Stéphane, Raghavan, Vijaya, Palacios, Joahnn, Grenier, Michèle, Zegan, Dan·2017·Energies

Abstract

Biomass pyrolysis and the valorization of co-products (biochar, bio-oil, syngas) could be a sustainable management solution for agricultural and forest residues. Depending on its properties, biochar amended to soil could improve fertility. Moreover, biochar is expected to mitigate climate change by reducing soil greenhouse gas emissions, if its C/N ratio is lower than 30, and sequestrating carbon if its O/Corg and H/Corg ratios are lower than 0.2 and 0.7, respectively. However, the yield and properties of biochar are influenced by biomass feedstock and pyrolysis operating parameters. The objective of this research study was to validate an approach based on the response surface methodology, to identify the optimal pyrolysis operating parameters (temperature, solid residence time, and carrier gas flowrate), in order to produce engineered biochars for carbon sequestration. The pyrolysis of forest residues, switchgrass, and the solid fraction of pig manure, was carried out in a vertical auger reactor following a Box-Behnken design, in order to develop response surface models. The optimal pyrolysis operating parameters were estimated to obtain biochar with the lowest H/Corg and O/Corg ratios. Validation pyrolysis experiments confirmed that the selected approach can be used to accurately predict the optimal operating parameters for producing biochar with the desired properties to sequester carbon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en10030288

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher pyrolysis temperature results in higher carbon content while losing nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen contents of biochar structure with increase in the ash content and a reduction of volatile materials.

    “Higher temperature results in higher carbon content while losing nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen contents of biochar structure (Brassard et al., 2017) with increase in the ash content and a reduction of volatile materials (Imam and Capareda, 2012; Kim W. K. et al., 2013; Budai et al., 2014; Zambon et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2017).”

    From Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on PhysicoChemical Properties and Acoustic-Based Amination of Biochar for Efficient CO2 Adsorption (2020) · cites this paper as Brassard et al., 2017

    In §3.3 (page not available), biochars produced under higher-temperature conditions had higher carbon and lower hydrogen and oxygen contents. The same passage reports higher, not lower, nitrogen contents for two of the comparisons; temperature also changed alongside other operating conditions. The ash and volatile-matter clause is attributed to other citations, not Brassard et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1-151.
  2. Foster, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Artaxo, P.; Berntsen, T.; Betts, R.; Fahey, D.W.; Haywood, J.; Lean, J.; Lowe, D.C.; Myhre, G.; et al. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 129-234.
  3. Liang, C.; MacDonald, D. Chapter 5: Agriculture (CRF Sector 3). In National Inventory Report 1990-2013: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada Part 1; Environment and Climate Change Canada: Gatineau, QC, Canada, 2015; pp. 123-146.
  4. Lee, J.W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 69-96.
  5. Garcia-Perez, M.; Lewis, T.; Kruger, C.E. Methods for Producing Biochar and Advanced Biofuels in Washington State. Part 1: Literature Review of Pyrolysis Reactors; First Project Report; Washington State Department of Ecology: Pullman, WA, USA, 2010; pp. 1-137.
  6. Resende, F.L.P. Chapter 1: Reactor Configurations and Design Parameters for Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass into Fuels, Energy, and Chemicals. In Reactor and Process Design in Sustainable Energy Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1-25.
  7. Myers, R.H.; Anderson-Cook, C.M.; Montgomery, D.C. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Somerset, NJ, USA, 2016; p. 20.
  8. Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR). Organic Soil improvers and Growing Media: Biochemical Fractionning and Estimation of Biological Stability: Method of Organic Matter Characterisation by Successive Solubilisations; Groupe AFNOR: La Plaine Saint-Denis, France, 2005; pp. 1-16.
  9. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). E 203-16: Standard Test Method for Water Using Using Volumetric Karl-Fischer Titration; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 1-9.
  10. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). D 1762-84: Standard Test Method for Chemical Analysis of Wood Charcoal; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011; pp. 1-2.
  11. Lehmann, J.; Joseph, S. Biochar for Environmental Management: An Introduction; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009; pp. 1-12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brassard, P., Godbout, S., Raghavan, V., Palacios, J., Grenier, M., & Zegan, D.
Affiliations
  • Institut de Recherche et de Développement en Agroenvironnement (CA)
  • Collège MacDonald (CA)
Corresponding author
Brassard, Patrick
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
288
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593966153
Cited by
73
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
Keywords
engineered biochar, carbon sequestration, biomass pyrolysis, switchgrass, forest residues, pig manure, soil amendment, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, response surface methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review