CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 363Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catastrophizing-a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with low back pain: a systematic review

Open access
Wertli, Maria M., Eugster, Rebekka, Held, Ulrike, Steurer, Johann, Kofmehl, Reto, Weiser, Sherri·2014·The Spine Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background context Psychological factors including catastrophizing thoughts are believed to influence the development of chronic low back pain (LBP).Purpose To assess the prognostic importance of catastrophizing as a coping strategy in patients with LBP.Study design This is a systematic review.Patient sample This study included patients with LBP.Outcome measures Work-related outcomes and perceived measures including return to work, pain, and disability.Methods In September 2012, the following databases were searched: BIOSIS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, OTSeeker, PeDRO, PsycInfo, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. To ensure completeness of the search, a hand search and a search of bibliographies were conducted and all relevant references included. All observational studies investigating the prognostic value of catastrophizing in patients with LBP were eligible. Included were studies with 100 and more patients and follow-up of at least 3 months. Excluded were studies with poor methodological quality, short follow-up duration, and small sample size.Results A total of 1,473 references were retrieved, and 706 references remained after the removal of duplicates. For 77 references, the full text was assessed and 19 publications based on 16 studies were included. Of four studies that investigated work-related outcomes, two found catastrophizing to be associated with work status. Most studies that investigated self-reported outcome measures (n=8, 66%) found catastrophizing to be associated with pain and disability at follow-up in acute, subacute, and chronic LBP patients. In most studies that applied cutoff values, patients identified as high catastrophizers experienced a worse outcome compared with low catastrophizers (n=5, 83%).Conclusions There is some evidence that catastrophizing as a coping strategy might lead to delayed recovery. The influence of catastrophizing in patients with LBP is not fully established and should be further investigated. Of particular importance is the establishment of cutoff levels for identifying patients at risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.003

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van der Windt, 2007, Do psychological factors predict outcome in both low-back pain and shoulder pain?, Ann Rheum Dis, 66, 313, 10.1136/ard.2006.053553 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wertli, M. M., Eugster, R., Held, U., Steurer, J., Kofmehl, R., & Weiser, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wertli, Maria M.
ORCID
Venue
The Spine Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
2639-2657
ISSN
1529-9430 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.003
OpenAlex
W2097408032
Cited by
363
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Spine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
catastrophizing, chronic low back pain, coping strategies, prognostic factors, return to work, disability, pain intensity, psychological factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Prognosis, Low Back Pain, Recovery of Function, Catastrophization, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review