Cited by 79Hormonal and reproductive studiesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

The impact of assay quality and reference ranges on clinical decision making in the diagnosis of androgen disorders

Bhasin, Shalender, Zhang, Anqi, Coviello, Andrea, Jasuja, Ravi, Ulloor, Jagadish, Singh, Ravinder, Vesper, Hubert, Vasan, Ramachandran S.·2008·Steroids

Abstract

The Endocrine Society guideline on Androgen Deficiency in Men emphasized that accurate measurement of testosterone (T) levels is central to the diagnosis of androgen deficiency. Similarly, accurate measurements of testosterone levels are important in the diagnosis of androgen disorders in women and children. However, the accuracy of direct radioimmunoassays for the measurement of total T levels has been questioned, especially in the low range prevalent in women, children, and androgen deficient men. Furthermore, reference limits for total and free T levels generated in a population-based sample of community-dwelling men, women, and children are not available. In the absence of standardized reference limits, the partitioning of total and free T levels into normal, low, or high values is fraught with substantial risk of misclassification. The recommendations for partitioning of individuals into those with low, normal, or high levels should be based on considerations of statistical distribution of total and free T values and the association of outcomes with varying degree of deviations from the reference limits. Ongoing efforts to generate population-based reference ranges for total and free testosterone levels in men and women will provide a framework for the interpretation of serum T levels and enhance the comprehensibility of circulating T values to practicing clinicians. These steps will facilitate the development of rational criteria for the diagnosis of androgen disorders in men, women, and children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.07.003

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhasin, S., Zhang, A., Coviello, A., Jasuja, R., Ulloor, J., Singh, R., Vesper, H., & Vasan, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Bhasin, Shalender
Venue
Steroids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
73
Issue
13
Pages
1311-1317
ISSN
0039-128X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078674857
Cited by
79
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Steroids (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01AG014369, 1R01AG22356)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
androgen deficiency, testosterone measurement, total testosterone, free testosterone, reference values, misclassification, clinical decision-making, population-based reference values, women
MeSH terms
Androgens, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Endocrine System Diseases, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review