Cited by 6Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsTrypanosoma species research and implications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The kinetoplastid kinetochore protein KKT23 acetyltransferase is a structural homolog of GCN5 that acetylates the histone H2A C-terminal tail

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The kinetochore is the macromolecular protein machine that drives chromosome segregation in eukaryotes. In an evolutionarily divergent group of organisms called kinetoplastids, kinetochores are built using a unique set of proteins (KKT1-25 and KKIP1-12). KKT23 is a constitutively localized kinetochore protein containing a C-terminal acetyltransferase domain of unknown function. Here, using X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, we have determined the structure and dynamics of the KKT23 acetyltransferase domain from Trypanosoma brucei and found that it is structurally similar to the GCN5 histone acetyltransferase domain. We find that KKT23 can acetylate the C-terminal tail of histone H2A and that knockdown of KKT23 results in decreased H2A acetylation levels in T. brucei. Finally, we have determined the crystal structure of the N-terminal region of KKT23 and shown that it interacts with KKT22. Our study provides important insights into the structure and function of the unique kinetochore acetyltransferase in trypanosomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2024.10.031

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. McIntosh, 2016, Mitosis, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 8, 10.1101/cshperspect.a023218 · DOI
  2. Cheeseman, 2014, The kinetochore, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 6, 10.1101/cshperspect.a015826 · DOI
  3. Musacchio, 2017, A Molecular View of Kinetochore Assembly and Function, Biology, 6, 10.3390/biology6010005 · DOI
  4. Akiyoshi, 2014, Discovery of unconventional kinetochores in kinetoplastids, Cell, 156, 1247, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.049 · DOI
  5. Nerusheva, 2016, Divergent polo box domains underpin the unique kinetoplastid kinetochore, Open Biol., 6, 10.1098/rsob.150206 · DOI
  6. Nerusheva, 2019, Identification of four unconventional kinetoplastid kinetochore proteins KKT22-25 in Trypanosoma brucei, Open Biol., 9, 10.1098/rsob.190236 · DOI
  7. D'Archivio, 2017, Trypanosome outer kinetochore proteins suggest conservation of chromosome segregation machinery across eukaryotes, JCB (J. Cell Biol.), 216, 379, 10.1083/jcb.201608043 · DOI
  8. Brusini, 2021, Trypanosome KKIP1 Dynamically Links the Inner Kinetochore to a Kinetoplastid Outer Kinetochore Complex, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 11, 10.3389/fcimb.2021.641174 · DOI
  9. Marciano, 2021, Kinetoplastid kinetochore proteins KKT2 and KKT3 have unique centromere localization domains, J. Cell Biol., 220, 10.1083/jcb.202101022 · DOI
  10. Jurrus, 2018, Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite, Protein Sci., 27, 112, 10.1002/pro.3280 · DOI
  11. Mo, 2016, Acetylation of Aurora B by TIP60 ensures accurate chromosomal segregation, Nat. Chem. Biol., 12, 226, 10.1038/nchembio.2017 · DOI
  12. Ohzeki, 2016, KAT7/HBO1/MYST2 Regulates CENP-A Chromatin Assembly by Antagonizing Suv39h1-Mediated Centromere Inactivation, Dev. Cell, 37, 413, 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.006 · DOI
  13. Dyda, 2000, GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases: a structural overview, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 29, 81, 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.81 · DOI
  14. DeLano, 2002, Pymol: An open-source molecular graphics tool, CCP4 Newsletter On Protein Crystallography, 40, 82
  15. Krissinel, 2007, Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state, J. Mol. Biol., 372, 774, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 · DOI
  16. Marmorstein, 2001, Histone acetyltransferases: function, structure, and catalysis, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 11, 155, 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00173-8 · DOI
  17. Shen, 2013, Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks, J. Biomol. NMR, 56, 227, 10.1007/s10858-013-9741-y · DOI
  18. Kay, 1989, Backbone Dynamics of Proteins As Studied by 15N Inverse Detected Heteronuclear NMR Spectroscopy: Application to Staphylococcal Nuclease, Biochemistry, 28, 8972, 10.1021/bi00449a003 · DOI
  19. Holm, 2023, DALI shines a light on remote homologs: One hundred discoveries, Protein Sci., 32, 10.1002/pro.4519 · DOI
  20. Drazic, 2018, NAA80 is actin's N-terminal acetyltransferase and regulates cytoskeleton assembly and cell motility, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 4399, 10.1073/pnas.1718336115 · DOI
  21. Goris, 2018, Structural determinants and cellular environment define processed actin as the sole substrate of the N-terminal acetyltransferase NAA80, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 4405, 10.1073/pnas.1719251115 · DOI
  22. Yang, 1996, A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A, Nature, 382, 319, 10.1038/382319a0 · DOI
  23. Bu, 2007, Loss of Gcn5 acetyltransferase activity leads to neural tube closure defects and exencephaly in mouse embryos, Mol. Cell Biol., 27, 3405, 10.1128/MCB.00066-07 · DOI
  24. Lee, 2007, Histone acetyltransferase complexes: one size doesn't fit all, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8, 284, 10.1038/nrm2145 · DOI
  25. Deák, 2023, Histone divergence in trypanosomes results in unique alterations to nucleosome structure, Nucleic Acids Res., 51, 7882, 10.1093/nar/gkad577 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Janzen, 2006, Unusual histone modifications in Trypanosoma brucei, FEBS Lett., 580, 2306, 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.044 · DOI
  27. Mandava, 2007, Histone modifications in Trypanosoma brucei, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 156, 41, 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.07.005 · DOI
  28. de Jesus, 2016, Chromatin Proteomics Reveals Variable Histone Modifications during the Life Cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi, J. Proteome Res., 15, 2039, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00208 · DOI
  29. Picchi, 2017, Post-translational Modifications of Trypanosoma cruzi Canonical and Variant Histones, J. Proteome Res., 16, 1167, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00655 · DOI
  30. Kraus, 2020, Distinct roles for H4 and H2A.Z acetylation in RNA transcription in African trypanosomes, Nat. Commun., 11, 1498, 10.1038/s41467-020-15274-0 · DOI
  31. Figueiredo, 2009, Epigenetic regulation in African trypanosomes: a new kid on the block, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 7, 504, 10.1038/nrmicro2149 · DOI
  32. Landeira, 2007, Nuclear repositioning of the VSG promoter during developmental silencing in Trypanosoma brucei, J. Cell Biol., 176, 133, 10.1083/jcb.200607174 · DOI
  33. Staneva, 2021, A systematic analysis of Trypanosoma brucei chromatin factors identifies novel protein interaction networks associated with sites of transcription initiation and termination, Genome Res., 31, 2138, 10.1101/gr.275368.121 · DOI
  34. Maree, 2022, Trypanosoma brucei histones are heavily modified with combinatorial post-translational modifications and mark Pol II transcription start regions with hyperacetylated H2A, Nucleic Acids Res., 50, 9705, 10.1093/nar/gkac759 · DOI
  35. Hong, 1993, Studies of the DNA binding properties of histone H4 amino terminus. Thermal denaturation studies reveal that acetylation markedly reduces the binding constant of the H4 "tail" to DNA, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 305, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54150-8 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Brower-Toland, 2005, Specific contributions of histone tails and their acetylation to the mechanical stability of nucleosomes, J. Mol. Biol., 346, 135, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.056 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Bannister, 2011, Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications, Cell Res., 21, 381, 10.1038/cr.2011.22 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Talbert, 2018, Transcribing Centromeres: Noncoding RNAs and Kinetochore Assembly, Trends Genet., 34, 587, 10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.001 · DOI
  39. Tschudi, 2012, Small interfering RNA-producing loci in the ancient parasitic eukaryote Trypanosoma brucei, BMC Genom., 13, 427, 10.1186/1471-2164-13-427 · DOI
  40. Ishii, 2020, Characterization of unconventional kinetochore kinases KKT10 and KKT19 in Trypanosoma brucei, J. Cell Sci., 133, 10.1242/jcs.240978 · DOI
  41. Poon, 2012, A modular and optimized single marker system for generating Trypanosoma brucei cell lines expressing T7 RNA polymerase and the tetracycline repressor, Open Biol., 2, 10.1098/rsob.110037 · DOI
  42. Gileadi, 2008, High throughput production of recombinant human proteins for crystallography, Methods Mol. Biol., 426, 221, 10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_14 · DOI
  43. Kelly, 2007, Functional genomics in Trypanosoma brucei: a collection of vectors for the expression of tagged proteins from endogenous and ectopic gene loci, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 154, 103, 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.03.012 · DOI
  44. Evans, 2022, Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer, bioRxiv
  45. Rodríguez, 2012, Practical structure solution with ARCIMBOLDO, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 68, 336, 10.1107/S0907444911056071 · DOI
  46. Cowtan, 2006, The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 62, 1002, 10.1107/S0907444906022116 · DOI
  47. Vranken, 2005, The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline, Proteins, 59, 687, 10.1002/prot.20449 · DOI
  48. Emsley, 2010, Features and development of Coot, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Skubák, 2018, A new MR-SAD algorithm for the automatic building of protein models from low-resolution X-ray data and a poor starting model, IUCrJ, 5, 166, 10.1107/S2052252517017961 · DOI
  50. Strong, 2006, Toward the structural genomics of complexes: crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 8060, 10.1073/pnas.0602606103 · DOI
  51. Linding, 2003, Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics, Structure, 11, 1453, 10.1016/j.str.2003.10.002 · DOI
  52. Potter, 2018, HMMER web server: 2018 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, W200, 10.1093/nar/gky448 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Schneider, 2012, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9, 671, 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Waterhouse, 2009, Jalview Version 2-A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench, Bioinformatics, 25, 1189, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
  55. Katoh, 2019, MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization, Brief. Bioinform., 20, 1160, 10.1093/bib/bbx108 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Cox, 2008, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification, Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 1367, 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Delaglio, 1995, NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes, J. Biomol. NMR, 6, 277, 10.1007/BF00197809 · DOI
  58. McCoy, 2007, Phaser crystallographic software, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 40, 658, 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Liebschner, 2019, Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix, Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol., 75, 861, 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Chen, 2019, A high-speed search engine pLink 2 with systematic evaluation for proteome-scale identification of cross-linked peptides, Nat. Commun., 10, 3404, 10.1038/s41467-019-11337-z · DOI
  61. Perez-Riverol, 2019, The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, 442, 10.1093/nar/gky1106 · DOI
  62. Schuck, 2014, SEDFIT-MSTAR: Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution analysis of polymers by sedimentation equilibrium in the ultracentrifuge, Analyst, 139, 79, 10.1039/C3AN01507F · DOI
  63. Aslett, 2010, TriTrypDB: a functional genomic resource for the Trypanosomatidae, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, 457, 10.1093/nar/gkp851 · DOI
  64. 2019, UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D506, 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Graham, 2019, xiView: A common platform for the downstream analysis of Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry data, bioRxiv
  66. Deutsch, 2023, The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 51, D1539, 10.1093/nar/gkac1040 · DOI
  67. Brun, 1979, Cultivation and in vitro cloning or procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Short communication, Acta Trop., 36, 289
  68. Cowtan, 2011, From crystal to structure with CCP4, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 67, 233, 10.1107/S0907444911007578 · DOI
  69. Adams, 2010, PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 213, 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Zhu, 2000, Protein dynamics measurements by TROSY-based NMR experiments, J. Magn. Reson., 143, 423, 10.1006/jmre.2000.2022 · DOI
  71. Burdett, 2023, BRCA1-BARD1 combines multiple chromatin recognition modules to bridge nascent nucleosomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 51, 11080, 10.1093/nar/gkad793 · DOI
  72. López-Escobar, 2022, Stage-specific transcription activator ESB1 regulates monoallelic antigen expression in Trypanosoma brucei, Nat Microbiol, 7, 1280, 10.1038/s41564-022-01175-z · DOI
  73. Rappsilber, 2007, Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips, Nat. Protoc., 2, 1896, 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Olsen, 2007, Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis, Nat. Methods, 4, 709, 10.1038/nmeth1060 · DOI
  75. Butenko, 2020, Evolution of metabolic capabilities and molecular features of diplonemids, kinetoplastids, and euglenids, BMC Biol., 18, 23, 10.1186/s12915-020-0754-1 · DOI
  76. Eddy, 1998, Profile hidden Markov models, Bioinformatics, 14, 755, 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Mirdita, 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat. Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Ludzia, P., Ishii, M., Deák, G., Spanos, C., Wilson, M. D., Redfield, C., & Akiyoshi, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Redfield, Christina
  • Akiyoshi, Bungo
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
123-135.e10
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404628429
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (227243/Z/23/Z, 210493/Z/18/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (T029471/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M010996/1, 210622/Z/18/Z)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • John Fell Fund, University of Oxford (226791, 108504)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
Keywords
kinetochore, histone acetyltransferase, Trypanosoma brucei, kinetoplastids, chromosome segregation
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Acetylation, Acetyltransferases, Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Histones, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Trypanosoma brucei brucei, Protozoan Proteins, Crystallography, X-Ray, Kinetochores, Histone Acetyltransferases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review