Cited by 649Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCell Adhesion Molecules Research

Inflammation in stroke and focal cerebral ischemia

Huang, Judy, Upadhyay, Urvashi M., Tamargo, Rafael J.·2006·Surgical Neurology

Abstract

Background A growing number of recent investigations have established a critical role for leukocytes in propagating tissue damage after ischemia and reperfusion in stroke. Experimental data obtained from animal models of middle cerebral artery occlusion implicate inflammatory cell adhesion molecules, chemokines, and cytokines in the pathogenesis of this ischemic damage. Methods Data from recent animal and human studies were reviewed to demonstrate that inflammatory events occurring at the blood-endothelium interface of the cerebral capillaries underlie the resultant ischemic tissue damage. Results After arterial occlusion, the up-regulated expression of cytokines including IL-1, and IL-6 act upon the vascular endothelium to increase the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, P-selectin, and E-selectin, which promote leukocyte adherence and accumulation. Integrins then serve to structurally modify the basal lamina and extracellular matrix. These inflammatory signals then promote leukocyte transmigration across the endothelium and mediate inflammatory cascades leading to further cerebral infarction. Conclusions Inflammatory interactions that occur at the blood-endothelium interface, involving cytokines, adhesion molecules, chemokines and leukocytes, are critical to the pathogenesis of tissue damage in cerebral infarction. Exploring these pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ischemic tissue damage may direct rational drug design in the therapeutic treatment of stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.12.028

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leukocyte infiltration further exacerbates inflammatory responses and worsens brain injury in stroke.

    “Leukocyte infiltration further exacerbates inflammatory responses and worsens brain injury (264).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [264]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, J., Upadhyay, U. M., & Tamargo, R. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Tamargo, Rafael J.
Venue
Surgical Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
232-245
ISSN
0090-3019 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167770959
Cited by
649
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 47
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgical Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
stroke, focal cerebral ischemia, ischemia-reperfusion injury, leukocyte adhesion, cytokines, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, ICAM-1, P-selectin, E-selectin, integrins, leukocyte transmigration, middle cerebral artery occlusion, cerebral infarction, chemokines, extracellular matrix
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Brain Ischemia, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Encephalitis, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Signal Transduction, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cytokines, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review