Cited by 2Educational Games and GamificationSecond Language Acquisition and LearningDigital Games and Media

A qualitative analysis of gamers' experiences with vocabulary acquisition: insights from grounded theory

Shahiwala, Sofiya, Rahul, D.R.·2025·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2025.103864

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahiwala, S., & Rahul, D. R.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
Corresponding author
Rahul, D.R.
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
135
Pages
103864
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414824997
Cited by
2
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (MISC 0084)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
vocabulary acquisition, game-based language learning, incidental learning, immersive gameplay, game genres, student empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review