The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Digital technologies have nowadays a significant impact on how new business ventures are imagined and created. The arising technology paradigm is leveraging the potential of collaboration and collective intelligence to design and launch more robust and sustainable entrepreneurial initiatives. However, although the topic of digital entrepreneurship is relevant and timely, there is a limited literature discussion on the real impact of digital technologies and collaboration on the entrepreneurial process. Further research is needed to describe the nature and characteristics of the entrepreneurial ecosystem enabled by the new socio-technical paradigm. Based on extant literature, this article proposes a definition of digital entrepreneurship ecosystem by highlighting the integrated digital-output and digital-environment perspectives. A collective intelligence approach is then adopted to define a descriptive framework and identify the distinguishing genes of a digital entrepreneurship ecosystem. Four dimensions associated to digital actors (who), digital activities (what), digital motivations (why), and digital organization (how) are defined and discussed. The framework was also applied to describe 9 real cases of companies and initiatives, which are analyzed as digital entrepreneurship ecosystems along the four key dimensions presented. The article ends with a discussion about the results and a research agenda for future studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3 · Cited by 4,392
The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184834 · Cited by 4,381
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
Benkler, Y. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,680
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036530 · Cited by 3,228
Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03 · Cited by 2,967
Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship
Nambisan, S. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12254 · Cited by 2,771
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique
Stam, E. (2015) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · Cited by 2,406
Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12105 · Cited by 2,394
The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Spigel, B. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12167 · Cited by 2,257
Cited by
Khurana, I., Dutta, D. K., & Singh Ghura, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048 · Cited by 443
Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach
Theodoraki, C., Dana, L.-P., & Caputo, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.005 · Cited by 297
How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems – A systematic literature review
P.S., D. V. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165 · Cited by 239
Healthcare apps’ purchase intention: A consumption values perspective
Chakraborty, D., & Paul, J. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102481 · Cited by 185
Confluence of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and digitalization in SMEs
Avelar, S., Borges-Tiago, T., Almeida, A., & Tiago, F. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114346 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 119791
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2987400793
- Cited by
- 1,044
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 129.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791
- The paper
- Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.