Cited by 185Health, Technology, Consumer BehaviorConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Healthcare apps’ purchase intention: A consumption values perspective

Chakraborty, Debarun, Paul, Justin·2023·Technovation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102481

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chakraborty, D., & Paul, J.
Affiliations
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
  • University of Puerto Rico System (PR)
Corresponding author
Paul, Justin
Venue
Technovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
120
Pages
102481
ISSN
0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211160291
Cited by
185
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 39
FWCI
29.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technovation (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
healthcare apps, consumption values, brand love, purchase intention, emotional value, conditional value, social values, online risk perception, customer involvement, consumer behavior, mobile health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review