The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies on Twitter are relatively abundant, while other popular platforms such as Reddit, LinkedIn, Instagram, or YouTube have not received the same level of attention.
“While studies on Twitter are relatively abundant, other popular platforms such as Reddit, LinkedIn, Instagram, or YouTube have not received the same level of attention (Iandoli et al. 2021).”
From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Iandoli et al. 2021
Digital networks tend towards homophily.
“Studies find that digital networks do tend towards homophily (Landoli et al., 2021)”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Landoli et al., 2021
Cites
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,748 · see citing works
The spreading of misinformation online
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · Cited by 2,407 · see citing works
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006 · Cited by 1,992 · see citing works
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940 · see citing works
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
FILTER BUBBLE: Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden
Pariser, E. (2012) · doi:10.3139/9783446431164 · Cited by 1,849 · see citing works
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618923114 · Cited by 1,396 · see citing works
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141 · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Garrett, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1163 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Measuring and moderating opinion polarization in social networks
Matakos, A., Terzi, E., & Tsaparas, P. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-017-0527-9 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Influencing Myself: Self-Reinforcement Through Online Political Expression
Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Keum, H., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2018) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650216644020 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The Effect of Collective Attention on Controversial Debates on Social Media
Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference · doi:10.1145/3091478.3091486 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Bavel, J. J., Robertson, C. E., del Rosario, K., Rasmussen, J., & Rathje, S. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-110258 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
OASIS: Open Agent Social Interaction Simulations with One Million Agents
Yang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zheng, Z., Jiang, Y., Gan, Z., Wang, Z., Ling, Z., Chen, J., Ma, M., Dong, B., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.11581 · Cited by 3
“Group Polarization occurs when individuals with similar views adopt more extreme positions after exchanging opinions.”
- Authors
- Iandoli, L., Primario, S., & Zollo, G.
- Affiliations
- St. John's University (US)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Primario, Simonetta
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 170
- Pages
- 120924
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3167193318
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- group polarization, online debate, social media, online discourse, freedom of expression, online manipulation, social media regulation, ethical design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
