PreprintCited by 168Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationComplex Network Analysis Techniques

OASIS: Open Agent Social Interaction Simulations with One Million Agents

Open access
Yang, Ziyi, Zhang, Zaibin, Zheng, Zirui, Jiang, Yuxian, Gan, Ziyue, Wang, Zhiyu, Ling, Zijian, Chen, Jinsong +15 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in enhancing rule-based agent-based models (ABMs) for social media platforms (i.e., X, Reddit) with more realistic large language model (LLM) agents, thereby allowing for a more nuanced study of complex systems. As a result, several LLM-based ABMs have been proposed in the past year. While they hold promise, each simulator is specifically designed to study a particular scenario, making it time-consuming and resource-intensive to explore other phenomena using the same ABM. Additionally, these models simulate only a limited number of agents, whereas real-world social media platforms involve millions of users. To this end, we propose OASIS, a generalizable and scalable social media simulator. OASIS is designed based on real-world social media platforms, incorporating dynamically updated environments (i.e., dynamic social networks and post information), diverse action spaces (i.e., following, commenting), and recommendation systems (i.e., interest-based and hot-score-based). Additionally, OASIS supports large-scale user simulations, capable of modeling up to one million users. With these features, OASIS can be easily extended to different social media platforms to study large-scale group phenomena and behaviors. We replicate various social phenomena, including information spreading, group polarization, and herd effects across X and Reddit platforms. Moreover, we provide observations of social phenomena at different agent group scales. We observe that the larger agent group scale leads to more enhanced group dynamics and more diverse and helpful agents' opinions. These findings demonstrate OASIS's potential as a powerful tool for studying complex systems in digital environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2411.11581

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts to scale up LLM-driven agents continue to grapple with critical limitations, including computational inefficiencies and inaccurate user behaviors.

    “these efforts continue to grapple with critical limitations, including computational inefficiencies and inaccurate user behaviors.”

    From AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society (2025) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Abstract describes existing LLM-based simulators as time-consuming and resource-intensive, and §2.6 describes measures to improve inference efficiency. The paper also acknowledges a gap between its generated users and real individuals, but it does not establish that inaccurate user behaviors are a limitation of the earlier scale-up efforts referred to in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

29 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jacob Devlin. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. · arXiv
  2. Nigel Gilbert. Agent-based models. Sage Publications, 2019.
  3. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Prasenjit Mitra, Sejeong Kwon, Bernard J. Jansen, Kam-Fai Wong, and Meey- oung Cha. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In Subbarao Kamb- hampati (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016, pp. 3818-3824. IJCAI/AAAI Press, 2016. URL http://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/16/537.
  4. Nature Reviews Psychology. Social media needs science-based guidelines. Nature Reviews Psy- chology, 3(6):367-367, Jun 2024. ISSN 2731-0574. doi: 10.1038/s44159-024-00327-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00327-8. · DOI
  5. Thomas C Schelling. Models of segregation. The American economic review, 59(2):488-493, 1969.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zheng, Z., Jiang, Y., Gan, Z., Wang, Z., Ling, Z., Chen, J., Ma, M., Dong, B., Gupta, P., Hu, S., Yin, Z., Li, G., Jia, X., Wang, L., Ghanem, B., Lu, H., Lu, C., Ouyang, W., Qiao, Y., Torr, P., & Shao, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404571155
Cited by
3
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
agent-based modeling, LLM agents, social media simulation, information dissemination, group polarization, herd effect, recommender systems, dynamic social networks, Twitter, Reddit, complex systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review