The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial Intelligence
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Schiavo et al. (2024) created a scale emphasizing the negative impact of AI-induced anxiety on technology acceptance.”
From Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS) (2025) · cites this paper as Schiavo et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Conversely, the Negative Perception sub-dimension, addressing concerns and anxieties related to AI, connects with the growing body of research on 'AI anxiety' (Wang & Wang, 2022;Zhang & Dafoe, 2019;Schiavo et al., 2024).”
From Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS) (2025) · cites this paper as Schiavo et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 · Cited by 5,688
What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376727 · Cited by 3,241
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dai, J., Gu, X., & Yu, T. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033 · Cited by 468
Al-Momani, A. M., Ramayah, T., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102592 · Cited by 154
Acceptance of artificial intelligence: key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies
Rane, N., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024) · Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48185/jaai.v5i2.1017 · Cited by 152
Wu, D., Zhang, S., Ma, Z., Yue, G. X.-G., & Dong, R. K. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12090332 · Cited by 127
Cengiz, S., & Peker, A. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07433-7 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiavo, G., Businaro, S., & Zancanaro, M.
- Affiliations
- Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Schiavo, Gianluca
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 102537
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4393320622
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 138 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 28
- FWCI
- 106.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- MIUR (PE00000013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- AI acceptance, AI literacy, AI anxiety, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, critical literacy, student anxiety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
