The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial Intelligence
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Schiavo et al. (2024) created a scale emphasizing the negative impact of AI-induced anxiety on technology acceptance.”
From Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS) (2025) · cites this paper as Schiavo et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Conversely, the Negative Perception sub-dimension, addressing concerns and anxieties related to AI, connects with the growing body of research on 'AI anxiety' (Wang & Wang, 2022;Zhang & Dafoe, 2019;Schiavo et al., 2024).”
From Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS) (2025) · cites this paper as Schiavo et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 · Cited by 5,688
What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376727 · Cited by 3,241
GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1 · Cited by 2,519
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 · Cited by 2,205
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8 · Cited by 1,911
The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.03425 · Cited by 1,907
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118 · Cited by 1,743
Shin, D. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 · Cited by 1,548
What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review
Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925 · Cited by 1,340
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xin, X. (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5281/zenodo.897039 · Cited by 1,274
The conditioning theory of fearacquisition: A critical examination
Rachman, S. (1977) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(77)90041-9 · Cited by 1,191
A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories
Taherdoost, H. (2018) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137 · Cited by 1,162
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2072768 · Cited by 1,036
Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies
Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543 · Cited by 963
AI and education: guidance for policy-makers
UNESCO (2021) · doi:10.54675/pcsp7350 · Cited by 929
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(2019) · doi:10.1145/3290605 · Cited by 841
Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887 · Cited by 830
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3419764 · Cited by 768
Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730 · Cited by 688
Sohn, K., & Kwon, O. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324 · Cited by 646
Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies
Scherer, M. U. (2015) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2609777 · Cited by 563
Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory
Li, J., & Huang, J. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 · Cited by 541
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education: The Challenges and Opportunities
Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124 · Cited by 489
Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014 · Cited by 488
Gruzd, A. A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.004 · Cited by 441
MODERATION ANALYSIS: ISSUES AND GUIDELINES
Memon, M. A., Cheah, J., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. (2019) · Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling · doi:10.47263/jasem.3(1)01 · Cited by 433
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23867 · Cited by 402
Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation
Stahl, B. C., & Wright, D. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701164 · Cited by 374
Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world
Druga, S., Vu, S. T., Likhith, E., & Qiu, T. (2019) · Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 · doi:10.1145/3311890.3311904 · Cited by 318
Gender bias in artificial intelligence
Leavy, S. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3195570.3195580 · Cited by 285
The association between smartphone use, stress, and anxiety: A meta‐analytic review
Vahedi, Z., & Saiphoo, A. (2018) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2805 · Cited by 280
Wanner, J., Herm, L.-V., Heinrich, K., & Janiesch, C. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00593-5 · Cited by 269
Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Hajjej, F., Thabit, S., El-Qirem, F. A., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Mulhem, A. A. A., Alkhdour, T., et al. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11223662 · Cited by 255
Zhong, Y., se-gu, O., & Moon, H. C. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101515 · Cited by 238
(2013) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 232
What drives students’ AI learning behavior: a perspective of AI anxiety
Wang, Y.-M., Wei, C., Lin, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2153147 · Cited by 228
The etiology of phobias: A nonassociative account
Menzies, R. G., & Clarke, J. C. (1995) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(94)00039-5 · Cited by 207
Review of the Factors Affecting Acceptance of AI-Infused Systems
Ismatullaev, U. V. U., & Kim, S. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211064707 · Cited by 198
Albayati, H. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203 · Cited by 188
Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it
Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.008 · Cited by 175
Kabakuş, A. K., Bahçekapılı, E., & Ayaz, A. (2023) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515231160028 · Cited by 172
Cugurullo, F., & Acheampong, R. A. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01598-6 · Cited by 142
Ho, T. M., Mantello, P. A., Ghotbi, N., Nguyen, M., Nguyen, H. T., & Vuong, Q. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102011 · Cited by 136
The concept and correlates of computer anxiety
Torkzadeh, G., & ANGULO, I. E. (1992) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299208924324 · Cited by 132
Teachers’ perspective on artificial intelligence education: An initial investigation
Polak, S., Schiavo, G., & Zancanaro, M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519866 · Cited by 132
Self-citationSanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12250-1 · Cited by 126
Zhan, E. S., Molina, M. D., Rheu, M., & Peng, W. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2261731 · Cited by 112
Jeng, M., Pai, F., & Yeh, T. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12040114 · Cited by 95
AI Literacy - Towards Measuring Human Competency in Artificial Intelligence
Pinski, M., & Benlian, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.021 · Cited by 94
Morosan, C. V. (2011) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2011.570645 · Cited by 75
Xu, N., & Wang, K. (2019) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.81 · Cited by 67
User anxiety as an external variable of technology acceptance model: A meta-analytic study
Donmez-Turan, A., & Kir, M. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.107 · Cited by 64
An Adaptation of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale into Turkish: Reliability and Validity Study.
Terzi, R. (2020) · International online journal of education and teaching · Cited by 51
Pre-Service Turkish Language Teachers’ Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence
Eyüp, B., & Kayhan, S. (2023) · International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.4p.43 · Cited by 46
Lin, C.-Y., & Xu, N. (2021) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1900808 · Cited by 44
seminr: Building and Estimating Structural Equation Models
Ray, S., Danks, N. P., & Valdez, A. S. C. (2018) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.seminr · Cited by 37
Lund, B. D., Agbaji, D. A., & Teel, Z. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4324580 · Cited by 31
Gibellini, G., Fabretti, V., & Schiavo, G. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585747 · Cited by 27
Self-citationModliński, A., Fortuna, P., & Rożnowski, B. (2023) · Museum Management and Curatorship · doi:10.1080/09647775.2023.2235678 · Cited by 17
(2018) · doi:10.2760/12297
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dai, J., Gu, X., & Yu, T. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033 · Cited by 468
Al-Momani, A. M., Ramayah, T., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102592 · Cited by 154
Acceptance of artificial intelligence: key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies
Rane, N., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024) · Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48185/jaai.v5i2.1017 · Cited by 152
Wu, D., Zhang, S., Ma, Z., Yue, G. X.-G., & Dong, R. K. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12090332 · Cited by 127
Cengiz, S., & Peker, A. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07433-7 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiavo, G., Businaro, S., & Zancanaro, M.
- Affiliations
- Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Schiavo, Gianluca
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 102537
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4393320622
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 138 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 28
- FWCI
- 106.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- MIUR (PE00000013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- AI acceptance, AI literacy, AI anxiety, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, critical literacy, student anxiety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review