CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 224Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Marketing and Social Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors influencing TikTok engagement behaviors in China: An examination of gratifications sought, narcissism, and the Big Five personality traits

Meng, Keira Shuyang, Leung, Louis·2021·Telecommunications Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102172
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract As an over-the-top (OTT) and non-subscription-based video-on-demand media service, mobile short-form video application (e.g., TikTok or Douyin) is a free video-sharing social networking service (SNS) distributing short-form video content to smartphones, smart TVs, and tablets. This study investigates the roles of gratifications-sought, narcissism, and personality traits in TikTok engagement behaviors (i.e., contribution, enhancement, and creation) in China. Data were gathered from a sample of 526 TikTok users through an online questionnaire survey in 2020. Factor analysis confirmed nine gratifications sought: escape, fashion, entertainment, information seeking, money making, sociability seeking, navigability, modality, and interactivity. In particular, extraverts and people with the quality of being vain were most active in the contributing, enhancing, and creating TikTok engagement behaviors. The results also show that exhibitionists and people who are more open to new experiences were found to create more, while narcissists with an attitude of entitlement also engaging strongly in giving likes, commenting, forwarding TikToks, and following others. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102172

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Guo, 2018, See the development of short-form video social application from TikTok, NewMedia, 9, 71
  2. Zhu, 2018, Short-form video: New media forms in mobile visual scene -- technology, social interaction, content and reflection, Press Circles, 7, 69

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 224

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Meng, K. S., & Leung, L.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Shue Yan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Leung, Louis
ORCID
Leung, Louis
Venue
Telecommunications Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
102172
ISSN
0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102172
OpenAlex
W3158254352
Semantic Scholar
096d9c5423c31f26275bf88bd69b3ff618c80553
Cited by
224
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 7
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
CMC Microsystems
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
TikTok, user engagement, gratification sought, narcissism, Big Five personality traits, short-form video, social networking services, over-the-top video streaming, extraversion, exhibitionism, openness to experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review