Cited by 356Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorCognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genes and the parsing of cognitive processes

Goldberg, Terry E., Weinberger, Daniel R.·2004·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Now that the human genome has been sequenced there exists the possibility of identifying specific genes that affect human cognition. In this article, recent studies that have found associations between common gene variants and specific cognitive processes are reviewed. Several principles for evaluating this new field are also discussed. The interpretation of results is far from simple because a single gene can affect multiple processes, multiple genes can impact on a single process, and multiple cognitive processes are intercorrelated. In general, functional neuroimaging has been a more sensitive assay of cognitive processing than behavioral measures used alone, although there are important caveats regarding its use. Replicated findings so far involve associations between a COMT polymorphism and prefrontally-based executive functions and neurophysiology, and a BDNF polymorphism and medial-temporal-cortex based declarative memory processes. Implicit in this review is a concern that many of the cognitive paradigms used evolved for purposes well outside those described here. As such it may be necessary to view cognition in novel ways, based on constraints imposed by genomics and neurobiology, in order to increase the effect size of genotypic influences on cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.011

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-activation of the salience and executive control networks is consistent with evidence that the natural tendency to become intensely absorbed in experience outside of hypnosis is correlated with hypnotizability.

    “Co-activation of the salience and executive control networks, of which the DLPFC is a key node are consistent with evidence that the natural tendency to become intensely absorbed in experience outside of hypnosis is correlated with hypnotizability,59–61 leading to the description of hypnosis as “effortless experiencing.”62”

    From Functional Brain Basis of Hypnotizability (2012) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, T. E., & Weinberger, D. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Terry E.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
325-335
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976250686
Cited by
356
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
COMT gene polymorphism, BDNF polymorphism, executive function, prefrontal cortex, declarative memory, medial temporal lobe, functional neuroimaging, cognitive paradigm, replication
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Cognition, Genes, Humans, Language, Genetic Linkage, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Processes, Neurobiology, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review