Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The structure and function of explanations

Lombrozo, Tania·2006·Trends in Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Keil, 2006, Explanation and understanding, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 227, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Murphy, 1985, The role of theories in conceptual coherence, Psychol. Rev., 92, 289, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289 · DOI
  3. Keil, 2003, Folkscience: coarse interpretations of a complex reality, Trends Cogn. Sci., 7, 368, 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00158-X · DOI
  4. Murphy, 1994, The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 20, 904, 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.904 · DOI
  5. Ahn, 2002, Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments, Mem. Cognit., 30, 107, 10.3758/BF03195270 · DOI
  6. Patalano, 2006, The importance of being coherent: category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning, J. Mem. Lang., 54, 407, 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.005 · DOI
  7. Rozenblit, 2002, The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth, Cogn. Sci., 26, 521, 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Trout, 2002, Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding, Philos. Sci., 69, 212, 10.1086/341050 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hilton, 1990, Conversational processes and causal explanation, Psychol. Bull., 107, 65, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hickling, 2001, The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: evidence from everyday conversation, Dev. Psychol., 37, 668, 10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.668 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wellman, 2004, Theory of mind for learning and teaching: the nature and role of explanation, Cogn. Dev., 19, 479, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.09.003 · DOI
  12. Lewis, 1988, Why and how to learn why: analysis-based generalization of procedures, Cogn. Sci., 12, 211, 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_3 · DOI
  13. Strevens, 2004, The causal and unification accounts of explanation unified – causally, Nous, 38, 154, 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2004.00466.x · DOI
  14. Einhorn, 1986, Judging probable cause, Psychol. Bull., 99, 1, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lombrozo, 2006, Functional explanation and the function of explanation, Cognition, 99, 167, 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hilton, 1996, Mental models and causal explanation: judgments of probable cause and explanatory relevance, Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 273, 10.1080/135467896394447 · DOI
  17. Dawes, 1999, A message from psychologists to economists: mere predictability doesn’t matter like it should (without a good story appended to it), J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 39, 29, 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00024-4 · DOI
  18. Ahn, 2003, Understanding it makes it more normal, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 10, 746, 10.3758/BF03196541 · DOI
  19. Ahn, W. et al. Dynamic interpretations of covariation data. In Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation (Gopnik, A. and Schulz, L.E., eds), Oxford University Press (in press)
  20. Ahn, 1995, The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution, Cognition, 54, 299, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00640-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kuhn, 2001, How do people know?, Psychol. Sci., 12, 1, 10.1111/1467-9280.00302 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Glassner, 2005, Pupils’ evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation, Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 75, 105, 10.1348/000709904X22278 · DOI
  23. Brem, 2000, Explanation and evidence in informal argument, Cogn. Sci., 24, 573, 10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2 · DOI
  24. Heit, 2000, Properties of inductive reasoning, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 7, 569, 10.3758/BF03212996 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sloman, 1994, When explanations compete: the role of explanatory coherence on judgments of likelihood, Cognition, 52, 1, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90002-7 · DOI
  26. Sloman, 1997, Explanatory coherence and the induction of properties, Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 81, 10.1080/135467897394374 · DOI
  27. Shafto, 2003, Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: novices to experts, naïve similarity to ecological knowledge, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 29, 641, 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.641 · DOI
  28. Medin, 2003, A relevance theory of induction, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 10, 517, 10.3758/BF03196515 · DOI
  29. Rehder, 2006, When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization, Mem. Cognit., 34, 3, 10.3758/BF03193382 · DOI
  30. Chi, 1994, Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding, Cogn. Sci., 18, 439
  31. Wong, 2002, The effects of self-explanation training on students’ problem solving in high-school mathematics, Learning & Instruction, 12, 233, 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00027-5 · DOI
  32. Aleven, 2002, An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor, Cogn. Sci., 26, 147, 10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Calin-Jageman, 2005, The role of encoding in the self-explanation effect, Cognition & Instruction, 23, 523, 10.1207/s1532690xci2304_4 · DOI
  34. Crowley, 1999, Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning, Child Dev., 70, 304, 10.1111/1467-8624.00023 · DOI
  35. Amsterlaw, 2006, Theories of mind in transition: a microgenetic study of the development of false belief understanding, J. Cogn. Dev., 7, 139, 10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_1 · DOI
  36. Rittle-Johnson, 2006, Promoting transfer: the effects of direct instruction and self-explanation, Child Dev., 77, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Renkl, 1997, Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences, Cogn. Sci., 21, 1, 10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1 · DOI · Paper page
  38. O’Reilly, 1998, A comparison of self-explanation and elaborative interrogation, Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 23, 434, 10.1006/ceps.1997.0977 · DOI
  39. Ross, 1977, Social explanation and social expectation: effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 35, 817, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.11.817 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Anderson, 1980, Perseverance of social theories: the role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 39, 1037, 10.1037/h0077720 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Koehler, 1991, Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment, Psychol. Bull., 110, 499, 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Thagard, 1989, Explanatory coherence, Behav. Brain Sci., 12, 435, 10.1017/S0140525X00057046 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pennington, 1993, Reasoning in explanation-based decision making, Cognition, 49, 123, 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-W · DOI · Paper page
  44. Read, 1993, Explanatory coherence in social explanations: a parallel distributed processing account, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 65, 429, 10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.429 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Lombrozo, T. and Rutstein, J.J. (2004) Simplicity in explanation. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 837–842, Erlbaum
  46. Preston, 2005, Explanations versus applications: the explanatory power of valuable beliefs, Psychol. Sci., 16, 826, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01621.x · DOI
  47. Kelemen, 1999, Function, goals, and intention: children's teleological reasoning about objects, Trends Cogn. Sci., 3, 461, 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01402-3 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Kelemen, 2005, Intuitions about origins: purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature, J. Cogn. Dev., 6, 3, 10.1207/s15327647jcd0601_2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
Lombrozo, T.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
464-470
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004
OpenAlex
W2034637247
Cited by
639
References
5
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure and function of explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004
The paper
Lombrozo, T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.