The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure and function of explanations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies in the Logic of Explanation
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286983 · Cited by 3,174
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 · Cited by 880
The Psychology of Associative Learning
Shanks, D. R. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623288 · Cited by 387
Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception
Prasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.003 · Cited by 230
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Keil, 2006, Explanation and understanding, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 227, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100 · DOI · Paper page
- Murphy, 1985, The role of theories in conceptual coherence, Psychol. Rev., 92, 289, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289 · DOI
- Keil, 2003, Folkscience: coarse interpretations of a complex reality, Trends Cogn. Sci., 7, 368, 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00158-X · DOI
- Murphy, 1994, The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 20, 904, 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.904 · DOI
- Ahn, 2002, Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments, Mem. Cognit., 30, 107, 10.3758/BF03195270 · DOI
- Patalano, 2006, The importance of being coherent: category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning, J. Mem. Lang., 54, 407, 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.005 · DOI
- Rozenblit, 2002, The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth, Cogn. Sci., 26, 521, 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Trout, 2002, Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding, Philos. Sci., 69, 212, 10.1086/341050 · DOI · Paper page
- Hilton, 1990, Conversational processes and causal explanation, Psychol. Bull., 107, 65, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
- Hickling, 2001, The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: evidence from everyday conversation, Dev. Psychol., 37, 668, 10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.668 · DOI · Paper page
- Wellman, 2004, Theory of mind for learning and teaching: the nature and role of explanation, Cogn. Dev., 19, 479, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.09.003 · DOI
- Lewis, 1988, Why and how to learn why: analysis-based generalization of procedures, Cogn. Sci., 12, 211, 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_3 · DOI
- Strevens, 2004, The causal and unification accounts of explanation unified – causally, Nous, 38, 154, 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2004.00466.x · DOI
- Einhorn, 1986, Judging probable cause, Psychol. Bull., 99, 1, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Lombrozo, 2006, Functional explanation and the function of explanation, Cognition, 99, 167, 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Hilton, 1996, Mental models and causal explanation: judgments of probable cause and explanatory relevance, Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 273, 10.1080/135467896394447 · DOI
- Dawes, 1999, A message from psychologists to economists: mere predictability doesn’t matter like it should (without a good story appended to it), J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 39, 29, 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00024-4 · DOI
- Ahn, 2003, Understanding it makes it more normal, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 10, 746, 10.3758/BF03196541 · DOI
- Ahn, W. et al. Dynamic interpretations of covariation data. In Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation (Gopnik, A. and Schulz, L.E., eds), Oxford University Press (in press)
- Ahn, 1995, The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution, Cognition, 54, 299, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00640-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuhn, 2001, How do people know?, Psychol. Sci., 12, 1, 10.1111/1467-9280.00302 · DOI · Paper page
- Glassner, 2005, Pupils’ evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation, Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 75, 105, 10.1348/000709904X22278 · DOI
- Brem, 2000, Explanation and evidence in informal argument, Cogn. Sci., 24, 573, 10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2 · DOI
- Heit, 2000, Properties of inductive reasoning, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 7, 569, 10.3758/BF03212996 · DOI · Paper page
- Sloman, 1994, When explanations compete: the role of explanatory coherence on judgments of likelihood, Cognition, 52, 1, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90002-7 · DOI
- Sloman, 1997, Explanatory coherence and the induction of properties, Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 81, 10.1080/135467897394374 · DOI
- Shafto, 2003, Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: novices to experts, naïve similarity to ecological knowledge, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 29, 641, 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.641 · DOI
- Medin, 2003, A relevance theory of induction, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 10, 517, 10.3758/BF03196515 · DOI
- Rehder, 2006, When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization, Mem. Cognit., 34, 3, 10.3758/BF03193382 · DOI
- Chi, 1994, Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding, Cogn. Sci., 18, 439
- Wong, 2002, The effects of self-explanation training on students’ problem solving in high-school mathematics, Learning & Instruction, 12, 233, 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00027-5 · DOI
- Aleven, 2002, An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor, Cogn. Sci., 26, 147, 10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Calin-Jageman, 2005, The role of encoding in the self-explanation effect, Cognition & Instruction, 23, 523, 10.1207/s1532690xci2304_4 · DOI
- Crowley, 1999, Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning, Child Dev., 70, 304, 10.1111/1467-8624.00023 · DOI
- Amsterlaw, 2006, Theories of mind in transition: a microgenetic study of the development of false belief understanding, J. Cogn. Dev., 7, 139, 10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_1 · DOI
- Rittle-Johnson, 2006, Promoting transfer: the effects of direct instruction and self-explanation, Child Dev., 77, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x · DOI · Paper page
- Renkl, 1997, Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences, Cogn. Sci., 21, 1, 10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1 · DOI · Paper page
- O’Reilly, 1998, A comparison of self-explanation and elaborative interrogation, Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 23, 434, 10.1006/ceps.1997.0977 · DOI
- Ross, 1977, Social explanation and social expectation: effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 35, 817, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.11.817 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 1980, Perseverance of social theories: the role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 39, 1037, 10.1037/h0077720 · DOI · Paper page
- Koehler, 1991, Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment, Psychol. Bull., 110, 499, 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
- Thagard, 1989, Explanatory coherence, Behav. Brain Sci., 12, 435, 10.1017/S0140525X00057046 · DOI · Paper page
- Pennington, 1993, Reasoning in explanation-based decision making, Cognition, 49, 123, 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-W · DOI · Paper page
- Read, 1993, Explanatory coherence in social explanations: a parallel distributed processing account, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 65, 429, 10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.429 · DOI · Paper page
- Lombrozo, T. and Rutstein, J.J. (2004) Simplicity in explanation. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 837–842, Erlbaum
- Preston, 2005, Explanations versus applications: the explanatory power of valuable beliefs, Psychol. Sci., 16, 826, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01621.x · DOI
- Kelemen, 1999, Function, goals, and intention: children's teleological reasoning about objects, Trends Cogn. Sci., 3, 461, 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01402-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Kelemen, 2005, Intuitions about origins: purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature, J. Cogn. Dev., 6, 3, 10.1207/s15327647jcd0601_2 · DOI
Cited by
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
Miller, T. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 · Cited by 5,302
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116 · Cited by 2,167
“In psychology, the general notions of interpretability and explanations have been studied at a more abstract level (17, 18), providing relevant conceptual perspectives.”
BackgroundAli, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021017 · Cited by 1,338
Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI
Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300831 · Cited by 906
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3387166 · Cited by 785
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.11839 · Cited by 783
Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence
Vilone, G., & Longo, L. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.009 · Cited by 598
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020240 · Cited by 587
Kaur, H., Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Caruana, R., Wallach, H., & Wortman Vaughan, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376219 · Cited by 564
Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612454303 · Cited by 457
Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0030399 · Cited by 429
Lai, V., & Tan, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287590 · Cited by 377
Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making
Vasconcelos, H., Jörke, M., Grunde-McLaughlin, M., Gerstenberg, T., Bernstein, M. S., & Krishna, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579605 · Cited by 402
The Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations Across Cultures and Development
Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., & Harris, P. L. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x · Cited by 332
Four principles of explainable artificial intelligence
Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Yates, A. N., Greene, K., Broniatowski, D. A., & Przybocki, M. A. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8312 · Cited by 262
Explanation and abductive inference
Lombrozo, T. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0014 · Cited by 242
Self-citationExplanatory Preferences Shape Learning and Inference
Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.001 · Cited by 229
Self-citationHuman-centered XAI: Developing design patterns for explanations of clinical decision support systems
Schoonderwoerd, T. A. J., Jorritsma, W., Neerincx, M. A., & van den Bosch, K. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102684 · Cited by 210
Pausing to consider why a headline is true or false can help reduce the sharing of false news
Fazio, L. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-009 · Cited by 187
Hendricks, L. A., Hu, R., Darrell, T., & Akata, Z. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_17 · Cited by 171
Considerations for Evaluation and Generalization in Interpretable Machine Learning
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2018) · The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98131-4_1 · Cited by 176
Representation of Principled Connections: A Window Onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception
Prasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01018.x · Cited by 156
Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., & Zaitchik, D. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02015.x · Cited by 158
Self-citationNarayanan, M., Chen, E., He, J., Kim, B., Gershman, S., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.00682 · Cited by 153
An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Techniques for Defect Prediction Models
Jiarpakdee, J., Tantithamthavorn, C. K., Dam, H. K., & Grundy, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.2982385 · Cited by 148
Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., & Pentland, A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249 · Cited by 149
Can language models learn from explanations in context?
Lampinen, A., Dasgupta, I., Chan, S., Mathewson, K., Tessler, M., Creswell, A., McClelland, J., Wang, J., & Hill, F. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.38 · Cited by 142
Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Broniatowski, D. A., & Przybocki, M. A. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8312-draft · Cited by 136
How Cognitive Biases Affect XAI-assisted Decision-making: A Systematic Review
Bertrand, A., Belloum, R., Eagan, J. R., & Maxwell, W. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534164 · Cited by 129
Making Sense of Generative Learning
Fiorella, L. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7 · Cited by 135
EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)—From Theory to Methods and Applications
Ortigossa, E. S., Gonçalves, T., & Nonato, L. G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3409843 · Cited by 124
An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation
Lage, I., Chen, E., He, J., Narayanan, M., Kim, B., Gershman, S., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00006 · Cited by 125
The Instrumental Value of Explanations
Lombrozo, T. (2011) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00413.x · Cited by 118
Self-citationSilva, A., Schrum, M., Hedlund-Botti, E., Gopalan, N., & Gombolay, M. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2101698 · Cited by 104
COGAM: Measuring and Moderating Cognitive Load in Machine Learning Model Explanations
Abdul, A., von der Weth, C., Kankanhalli, M., & Lim, B. Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376615 · Cited by 96
Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review
Vilone, G., & Longo, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00093 · Cited by 269
Turpin, M., Michael, J., Perez, E., & Bowman, S. R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.04388 · Cited by 262
“…human-written explanations, these explanations are not only known to be incomplete, often omitting crucial parts of the causal chain for a particular event (Lombrozo, 2006; Hilton, 2017), but they can also often be unfaithful accounts of individuals’ cognitive processes (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundThe hazards of explanation: Overgeneralization in the face of exceptions.
Williams, J. J., Lombrozo, T., & Rehder, B. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0030996 · Cited by 88
Self-citationFok, R., & Weld, D. S. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12182 · Cited by 81
Psychological foundations of explainability and interpretability in artificial intelligence
Broniatowski, D. A. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8367 · Cited by 76
Instructors as Innovators: A future-focused approach to new AI learning opportunities, with prompts
Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05181 · Cited by 75
Explaining the moral of the story
Walker, C. M., & Lombrozo, T. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.007 · Cited by 71
Self-citationLiao, Q. V., Zhang, Y., Luss, R., Doshi-Velez, F., & Dhurandhar, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21995 · Cited by 69
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
(2019) · Research Library Issues · doi:10.29242/rli.299 · Cited by 59
Kim, S. S. Y., Vaughan, J. W., Liao, Q. V., Lombrozo, T., & Russakovsky, O. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714020 · Cited by 58
“In line with everyday usage and much of the psychology literature [56, 78, 80], we refer to such supporting details as an explanation of the answer.”
Self-citationFok, R., & Weld, D. S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.07722 · Cited by 54
Artificial agents’ explainability to support trust: considerations on timing and context
Papagni, G., de Pagter, J., Zafari, S., Filzmoser, M., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01462-7 · Cited by 52
Service recovery by AI or human agents: Do failure and strategy context matter?
Fürst, A., Trißler, L., Friedrich, R., & Wirtz, J. (2025) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2024-0190 · Cited by 42
Architecture of explanatory inference in the human prefrontal cortex
Barbey, A. K., & Patterson, R. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00162 · Cited by 40
Hidden conflicts: Explanations make inconsistencies harder to detect
Khemlani, S. S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.010 · Cited by 36
Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task
Edwards, B. J., Williams, J. J., Gentner, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011 · Cited by 34
Self-citationReflecting on explanatory ability: A mechanism for detecting gaps in causal knowledge.
Johnson, D. R., Murphy, M. P., & Messer, R. M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000161 · Cited by 30
What Makes Everyday Scientific Reasoning So Challenging?
(2017) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2016.11.006 · Cited by 29
“Interfaces for explanations in human-AI interaction: proposing a design evaluation approach,”
Mucha, H., Robert, S., Breitschwerdt, R., & Fellmann, M. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451759 · Cited by 30
Beyond the “Wow” Factor: Using Generative AI for Increasing Generative Sense-Making
Makransky, G., Shiwalia, B. M., Herlau, T., & Blurton, S. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10039-x · Cited by 27
Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation‐Based Category Learning
Chin‐Parker, S., & Cantelon, J. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12405 · Cited by 18
A contrastive account of explanation generation
Chin-Parker, S., & Bradner, A. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1349-x · Cited by 15
Communicating Missing Causal Information to Explain a Robot’s Past Behavior
Han, Z., & Yanco, H. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3568024 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Lombrozo, T.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 464-470
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034637247
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.