Cited by 146Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Sleep Spindles and Memory Reprocessing

Open access
Antony, James W., Schönauer, Monika, Staresina, Bernhard P., Cairney, Scott A.·2019·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

We propose a framework for the memory function of spindle oscillations during sleep. In this framework, memories are reinstated by spindle events and further reprocessed during subsequent spindle refractory periods. We posit that spindle refractoriness is crucial for protecting memory reprocessing from interference. We further argue that temporally-coordinated spindle refractory periods across local networks facilitate the consolidation of rich, multimodal representations, and that localized spindle refractoriness optimizes oscillatory interactions that support systems consolidation in the sleeping brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2018.09.012

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contemporary models of sleep-associated memory processing propose that memories are reactivated during sleep and thereby integrated into long-term storage.

    “Contemporary models of sleep-associated memory processing propose that memories are reactivated during sleep, and thereby integrated into long-term storage [5,12–16].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antony, J. W., Schönauer, M., Staresina, B. P., & Cairney, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Cairney, Scott A.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
1-3
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897649821
Cited by
146
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • CV Starr Fellowship
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Fellowship
  • Wellcome Trust/Royal Society Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (107672/Z/15/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MRC) Career Development Award (MR/P020208/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
sleep spindles, memory reprocessing, memory consolidation, systems consolidation
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Animals, Brain, Electroencephalography, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review