Cited by 330Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Reasons for failed trials of disease-modifying treatments for alzheimer disease and their contribution in recent research

Open access
Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G., Anastasiou, Aikaterini I., Zachariou, Venetia, Pelidou, Sygkliti-Henrietta·2019·Biomedicines

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Despite all scientific efforts and many protracted and expensive clinical trials, no new drug has been approved by FDA for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) since 2003. Indeed, more than 200 investigational programs have failed or have been abandoned in the last decade. The most probable explanations for failures of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for AD may include late initiation of treatments during the course of AD development, inappropriate drug dosages, erroneous selection of treatment targets, and mainly an inadequate understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AD, which may necessitate combination treatments rather than monotherapy. Clinical trials’ methodological issues have also been criticized. Drug-development research for AD is aimed to overcome these drawbacks. Preclinical and prodromal AD populations, as well as traditionally investigated populations representing all the clinical stages of AD, are included in recent trials. Systematic use of biomarkers in staging preclinical and prodromal AD and of a single primary outcome in trials of prodromal AD are regularly integrated. The application of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarkers, including new biomarkers—such as Tau positron emission tomography, neurofilament light chain (blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker of axonal degeneration) and neurogranin (CSF biomarker of synaptic functioning)—to clinical trials allows more precise staging of AD. Additionally, use of Bayesian statistics, modifiable clinical trial designs, and clinical trial simulators enrich the trial methodology. Besides, combination therapy regimens are assessed in clinical trials. The above-mentioned diagnostic and statistical advances, which have been recently integrated in clinical trials, are relevant to the recent failures of studies of disease-modifying treatments. Their experiential rather than theoretical origins may better equip potentially successful drug-development strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biomedicines7040097

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New AD drug development has faced many obstacles, including high monetary and time costs and high failure rates in preclinical and clinical trials.

    “New AD drug development has faced many obstacles, including high monetary and time costs and high failure rates in preclinical and clinical trials (Cummings et al., 2014;Yiannopoulou et al., 2019).”

    From Drug repurposing for Alzheimer’s disease from 2012–2022—a 10-year literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Yiannopoulou et al., 2019

    The Introduction reports more than 200 failed or abandoned AD investigational programs, and the Discussion describes a high failure rate for disease-modifying treatments. The reviewed failures are clinical trials; the Introduction says animal studies were included only for additional information. The body of our copy does not establish high failure rates in preclinical trials or directly document monetary costs, though it discusses reducing trial duration. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. [2]Scheltens P. Blennow K. Breteler M.M. de Strooper B. Frisoni G.B. Salloway S. Van der Flier W.M. Alzheimer’s disease Lancet 2016 388 505 517 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1 26921134 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Cummings J. Lee G. Aaron Ritter A. Sabbagh M. Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2019 Alzheimer Dement. 2019 5 272 293 10.1016/j.trci.2019.05.008 31334330 PMC6617248 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Anderson R.M. Hadjichrysanthou C. Evans S. Wong M.M. Why do so many clinical trials of therapies for Alzheimer’s disease fail? Lancet 2017 25 2327 2329 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32399-1 29185425 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Atri A. Current and Future Treatments in Alzheimer’s Disease Semin Neurol. 2019 39 227 240 10.1055/s-0039-1678581 30925615 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Gauthier S. Albert M. Fox N. Goedert M. Kivipelto M. Mestre-Ferrandiz J. Middleton L.T. Why has therapy development for dementia failed in the last two decades? Alzheimers Dement. 2016 12 60 64 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.003 26710325 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Cummings J.L. Tong G. Ballard C. Treatment Combinations for Alzheimer’s Disease: Current and Future Pharmacotherapy Options J. Alzheimer Dis. 2019 67 779 794 10.3233/JAD-180766 PMC6398562 30689575 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [10]Anand A. Patience A. Sharma N. Khurana N. The present and future of pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease: A comprehensive review Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017 815 364 375 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.09.043 28978455 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Bondi M.W. Edmonds E.C. Salmon D.P. Alzheimer’s Disease: Past, Present, and Future J. Int. Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 23 818 831 10.1017/S135561771700100X 29198280 PMC5830188 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [12]Parasrampuria D.A. Benet L.Z. Sharma A. Why Drugs Fail in Late Stages of Development: Case Study Analyses from the Last Decade and Recommendations AAPS J. 2018 20 46 10.1208/s12248-018-0204-y 29536211 · DOI
  10. [13]Doody R.S. Raman R. Farlow M. Iwatsubo T. Vellas B. Joffe S. Kieburtz K. He F. Sun X. Thomas R.G. Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Steering Committee, Siemers, E.; Sethuraman, G.; Mohs, R.; Semagacestat Study Group. A phase 3 trial of semagacestat for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2013 369 341 350 10.1056/NEJMoa1210951 23883379 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]Coric V. Salloway S. van Dyck C.H. Dubois B. Andreasen N. Brody M. Curtis C. Soininen H. Thein S. Shiovitz T. Targeting Prodromal Alzheimer Disease With Avagacestat: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Neurol. 2015 72 1324 1333 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0607 26414022 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [15]Muntimadugu E. Dhommati R. Jain A. Challa V.G. Shaheen M. Khan W. Intranasal delivery of nanoparticle encapsulated tarenflurbil: A potential brain targeting strategy for Alzheimer’s disease Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016 20 224 234 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.05.012 27185298 · DOI
  13. [18]Henley D. Raghavan N. Sperling R. Aisen P. Raman R. Romano G. Preliminary Results of a Trial of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2019 11 1483 1485 10.1056/NEJMc1813435 30970197 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [22]Relkin N.R. Thomas R.G. Rissman R.A. Brewer J.B. Rafii M.S. van Dyck C.H. Jack C.R. Sano M. Knopman D.S. Raman R. A phase 3 trial of IV immunoglobulin for Alzheimer disease Neurology 2017 2 1768 1775 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003904 28381506 PMC5409846 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [24]Ower A.K. Hadjichrysanthou C. Gras L. Goudsmit J. Anderson R.M. de Wolf F. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Temporal association patterns and dynamics of amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer’s disease Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2018 33 657 666 10.1007/s10654-017-0326-z 29071500 PMC6061138 · DOI
  16. [28]Villemagne V.L. Rowe C.C. Barnham K.J. Cherny R. Woodward M. Bozinosvski S. Salvado O. Bourgeat P. Perez K. Fowler C. A randomized, exploratory molecular imaging study targeting amyloid β with a novel 8-OH quinoline in Alzheimer’s disease: The PBT2-204 IMAGINE study Alzheimers Dement. 2017 3 622 635 10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.001 PMC5702880 29201996 · DOI
  17. [32]Molinuevo J.L. Ayton S. Batrla R. Bednar M.M. Bittner T. Cummings J. Fagan A.M. Hampel H. Mielke M.M. Mikulskis A. Current state of Alzheimer’s fluid biomarkers Acta. Neuropathol. 2018 136 821 853 10.1007/s00401-018-1932-x 30488277 PMC6280827 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [33]Pontecorvo M.J. Devous M.D. Sr. Navitsky M. Lu M. Salloway S. Schaerf F.W. Jennings D. Arora A.K. McGeehan A. Lim N.C. 18-AV-1451-A05 investigators. Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition Brain. 2017 140 748 763 28077397 PMC5382945
  19. [34]Giau V.V. Bagyinszky E. An S.S.A. Potential Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 4149 10.3390/ijms20174149 PMC6747411 31450692 · DOI
  20. [35]Hansson O. Zetterberg H. Buchhave P. Londos E. Blennow K. Minthon L. Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A follow-up study Lancet Neurol. 2006 5 228 234 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70355-6 16488378 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [36]Isaac M. Vamvakas S. Abadie E. Jonsson B. Gispen C. Pani L. Qualification opinion of novel methodologies in the predementia stage of Alzheimer’s disease: Cerebrospinal fluid related biomarkers for drugs affecting amyloid burden—Regulatory considerations by European Medicines Agency focusing in improving benefit/risk in regulatory trials Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 21 781 788 21903360
  22. [37]Lewczuk P. Riederer P. O’Bryant S.E. Verbeek M.M. Dubois B. Visser P.J. Jellinger K.A. Engelborghs S. Ramirez A. Parnetti L. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2018 19 244 328 10.1080/15622975.2017.1375556 29076399 PMC5916324 · DOI
  23. [38]Janelidze S. Zetterberg H. Mattsson N. Palmqvist S. Vanderstichele H. Lindberg O. van Westen D. Stomrud E. Minthon L. Blennow K. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/ Aβ38 ratios: Better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2016 3 154 165 10.1002/acn3.274 27042676 PMC4774260 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [39]Shen Y. Wang H. Sun Q. Yao H. Keegan A.P. Mullan M. Wilson J. Lista S. Leyhe T. Laske C. Increased plasma beta-secretase 1 may predict conversion to Alzheimer’s disease dementia in individuals with mild cognitive impairment Biol. Psychiatry 2018 83 447 455 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.02.007 28359566 PMC5656540 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [40]Iturria-Medina Y. Sotero R.C. Toussaint P.J. Mateos-Pérez J.M. Evans A.C. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis Nat. Commun. 2016 7 11934 10.1038/ncomms11934 27327500 PMC4919512 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [41]Guo L.H. Alexopoulos P. Perneczky R. Heart-type fatty acid binding protein and vascular endothelial growth factor: Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker candidates for Alzheimer’s disease Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2013 263 553 560 10.1007/s00406-013-0405-4 23591828 · DOI
  27. [42]Desikan R.S. Thompson W.K. Holland D. Hess C.P. Brewer J.B. Zetterberg H. Blennow K. Andreassen O.A. McEvoy L.K. Hyman B.T. Heart fatty acid binding protein and Aβ-associated Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration Mol. Neurodegener 2013 8 39 10.1186/1750-1326-8-39 24088526 PMC3850652 · DOI
  28. [43]Chiasserini D. Biscetti L. Eusebi P. Salvadori N. Frattini G. Simoni S. De Roeck N. Tambasco N. Stoops E. Vanderstichele H. Differential role of CSF fatty acid binding protein 3, α-synuclein, and Alzheimer’s disease core biomarkers in Lewy body disorders and Alzheimer’s dementia Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2017 9 52 10.1186/s13195-017-0276-4 28750675 PMC5532764 · DOI
  29. [44]Gispert J.D. Suárez-Calvet M. Monté G.C. Tucholka A. Falcon C. Rojas S. Rami L. Sánchez-Valle R. Lladó A. Kleinberger G. Cerebrospinal fluid’s TREM2 levels are associated with gray matter volume increases and reduced diffusivity in early Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimers Dement. 2016 12 1259 1272 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.005 27423963 · DOI
  30. [45]Tan Y.J. Ng A.S.L. Vipin A. Lim J.K.W. Chander R.J. Ji F. Qiu Y. Ting S.K.S. Hameed S. Lee T. Higher peripheral TREM2 mRNA levels relate to cognitive deficits and hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017 58 413 423 10.3233/JAD-161277 28453482 · DOI
  31. [46]Querol-Vilaseca M. Colom-Cadena M. Pegueroles J. San Martín-Paniello C. Clarimon J. Belbin O. Fortea J. Lieo A. YKL-40 (Chitinase 3-like I) is expressed in a subset of astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies J. Neuroinfammation 2017 14 118 10.1186/s12974-017-0893-7 PMC5466718 28599675 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [47]Tarawneh R. D’Angelo G. Crimmins D. Herries E. Griest T. Fagan A.M. Zipfel G.J. Ladenson J.H. Morris J.C. Holtzman D.M. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of the synaptic marker neurogranin in Alzheimer disease JAMA Neurol. 2016 73 561 571 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0086 27018940 PMC4861689 · DOI
  33. [48]Mavroudis I.A. Petridis F. Chatzikonstantinou S. Kazis D. A meta-analysis on CSF neurogranin levels for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019 28 1 8 10.1007/s40520-019-01326-z 31463927 · DOI
  34. [50]Toledo J.B. Kor A. Shaw L.M. Trojanowski J.Q. Zhang J. CSF alpha-synuclein improves diagnostic and prognostic performance of CSF tau and Abeta in Alzheimer’s disease Acta Neuropathol. 2013 126 683 697 10.1007/s00401-013-1148-z 23812319 PMC3812407 · DOI
  35. [51]Williams S.M. Schulz P. Rosenberry T.L. Caselli R.J. Sierks M.R. Blood-based oligomeric and other protein variant biomarkers to facilitate presymptomatic diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017 58 23 35 10.3233/JAD-161116 28372328 · DOI
  36. [52]Ayton S. Faux N.G. Bush A.I. Association of cerebrospinal fluid ferritin level with preclinical cognitive decline in APOE-ɛ4 carriers JAMA Neurol. 2017 74 122 125 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4406 27893873 · DOI
  37. [53]Chang Y.T. Chang W.N. Tsai N.W. Huang C.C. Kung C.T. Su Y.J. Lin W.C. Cheng B.C. Su C.M. Chiang Y.F. The roles of biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidant in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review BioMed Res. Int. 2014 2014 1 14 10.1155/2014/182303 24949424 PMC4053273 · DOI
  38. [54]García-Blanco A. Baquero M. Vento M. Gil E. Luis Bataller L. Cháfer-Pericás C. Potential oxidative stress biomarkers of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease J. Neurol. Sci. 2017 373 295 302 28131209
  39. [55]Torres L.L. Quaglio N.B. de Souza G.T. Garcia R.T. Dati L.M. Moreira W.L. Loureiro A.P. de Souza-Talarico J.N. Smid J. Porto C.S. Peripheral oxidative stress biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011 26 59 68 10.3233/JAD-2011-110284 21593563 · DOI
  40. [56]Practicò D. Clark C.M. Liun F. Rokach J. Lee V.Y. Trojanowski J.Q. Increase of brain oxidative stress in mild cognitive impairment: A possible predictor of Alzheimer disease Arch. Neurol. 2002 59 972 976 10.1001/archneur.59.6.972 12056933 · DOI
  41. [57]Peña-Bautista C. López-Cuevas R. Cuevas A. Baquero M. Cháfer-Pericás C. Lipid peroxidation biomarkers correlation with medial temporal atrophy in early Alzheimer Disease Neurochem. Int. 2019 129 104519 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104519 31398364 · DOI
  42. [58]Moslemnezhad A. Mahjoub S. Moghadasi M. Altered plasma marker of oxidative DNA damage and total antioxidant capacity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease Caspian J. Intern. Med. 2016 7 88 92 27386059 PMC4913710
  43. [59]Cervellati C. Romani A. Seripa D. Cremonini E. Bosi C. Magon S. Bergamini C.M. Valacchi G. Pilotto A. Zuliani G. Systemic oxidative stress and conversion to dementia of elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment BioMed. Res. Int. 2014 2014 309507 10.1155/2014/309507 24524075 PMC3913282 · DOI
  44. [60]Chico L. Simoncini C. Lo Gerfo A. Rocchi A. Petrozzi L. Carlesi C. Volpi L. Tognoni G. Siciliano G. Bonuccelli U. Oxidative stress and APO E polymorphisms in Alzheimer’s disease and in mild cognitive impairment Free Radic. Res. 2013 47 569 576 10.3109/10715762.2013.804622 23668794 · DOI
  45. [61]Tarawneh R. Lee J.M. Ladenson J.H. Morris J.C. Holtzman D.M. CSF VILIP-1 predicts rates of cognitive decline in early Alzheimer disease Neurology 2012 78 709 719 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318248e568 22357717 PMC3306162 · DOI
  46. [62]Zetterberg H. Neurofilament Light: A Dynamic Cross-Disease Fluid Biomarker for Neurodegeneration Neuron. 2016 91 1 3 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.030 27387643 · DOI · Paper page
  47. [64]Mattsson N. Andreasson U. Zetterberg H. Blennow K. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Association of Plasma Neurofilament Light with Neurodegeneration in Patients with Alzheimer Disease JAMA Neurol. 2017 74 557 566 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117 28346578 PMC5822204 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [65]Zhou W. Zhang J. Ye F. Xu G. Su H. Su Y. Zhang X. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Plasma neurofilament light chain levels in Alzheimer’s disease Neurosci. Lett. 2017 650 60 64 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.04.027 28428015 · DOI · Paper page
  49. [66]Yuan A. Rao M.V. Veeranna Nixon R.A. Neurofilaments and neurofilament proteins in health and disease Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017 9 a018309 10.1101/cshperspect.a018309 28373358 PMC5378049 · DOI
  50. [68]Albert M. Zhu Y. Moghekar A. Mori S. Miller M.I. Soldan A. Pettigrew C. Selnes O. Li S. Wang M.C. Predicting progression from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment for individuals at 5 years Brain 2018 141 877 887 10.1093/brain/awx365 29365053 PMC5837651 · DOI · Paper page
  51. [69]Yin C. Li S. Zhao W. Feng J. Brain imaging of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease Neural Regen. Res. 2013 8 435 444 25206685 PMC4146132
  52. [70]Rabinovici G.D. Gatsonis C. Apgar C. Chaudhary K. Gareen I. Hanna L. Hendrix J. Hillner B.E. Olson C. Lesman-Segev O.H. Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography with Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia Jama 2019 321 1286 1294 10.1001/jama.2019.2000 30938796 PMC6450276 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [72]Johnson K.A. Schultz A. Betensky R.A. Becker J.A. Sepulcre J. Rentz D. Mormino E. Chhatwal J. Amariglio R. Papp K. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease Ann. Neurol. 2016 79 110 119 10.1002/ana.24546 26505746 PMC4738026 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [74]Boada E. Ramos-Fernandez E. Guivernau B. Munoz F.J. Costa M. Ortiz A.M. Jorquera J.I. Nunez L. Torres M. Paez A. Treatment of Alzheimer disease using combination therapy with plasma exchange and haemapheresis with albumin and intravenous immunoglobulin: Rationale and treatment approach of the AMBAR (Alzheimer Management by Albumin Replacement) study Neurologia 2016 31 473 481 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.02.003 25023458 · DOI
  55. [75]Tomaszewski S. Gauthier S. Wimo A. Rosa-Neto P. Combination therapy of anti-tau and anti-amyloid drugs for disease modification in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: Socio-economic considerations modeled on treatments for tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and breast cancer J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 2016 3 164 172 29205255
  56. [76]Evans S.R. Clinical trial structures J. Exp. Stroke Transl. Med. 2010 3 8 18 10.6030/1939-067X-3.1.8 21423788 PMC3059315 · DOI
  57. [77]Bateman R.J. Benzinger T.L. Berry S. Clifford D.B. Duggan C. Fagan A.M. Fanning K. Farlow M.R. Hassenstab J. McDade E.M. The DIAN-TU Next Generation Alzheimer’s prevention trial: Adaptive design and disease progression model Alzheimers Dement. 2017 13 8 19 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.005 27583651 PMC5218895 · DOI · Paper page
  58. [78]Ritchie C.W. Molinuevo J.L. Truyen L. Satlin A. Van der Geyten S. Lovestone S. European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia Consortium Development of interventions for the secondary prevention of Alzheimer’s dementia: The European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia (EPAD) project Lancet Psychiatry 2016 3 179 186 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00454-X 26683239 · DOI
  59. [79]Satlin A. Wang J. Logovinsky V. Berry S. Swanson C. Dhadda S. Berry D.A. Design of a Bayesian adaptive phase 2 proof-of-concept trial for BAN2401, a putative disease-modifying monoclonal antibody for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimers Dement. 2016 2 1 12 10.1016/j.trci.2016.01.001 PMC5644271 29067290 · DOI
  60. [81]Howard R. Liu K.Y. Questions EMERGE as Biogen claims aducanumab turnaround Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019 10.1038/s41582-019-0295-9 31784690 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [82]Morris G.P. Clark I.A. Vissel B. Questions concerning the role of amyloid-β in the definition, aetiology and diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease Acta Neuropathol. 2018 136 663 689 10.1007/s00401-018-1918-8 30349969 PMC6208728 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [83]Panza F. Lozupone M. Dibello V. Greco A. Daniele A. Seripa D. Logroscino G. Imbimbo B.P. Are antibodies directed against amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers the last call for the Aβ hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease? Immunotherapy 2019 11 3 6 10.2217/imt-2018-0119 30702009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yiannopoulou, K. G., Anastasiou, A. I., Zachariou, V., & Pelidou, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • Henry Dunant Hospital (GR)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Department of Neurology, University of Ioannina, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece
Corresponding author
Yiannopoulou, Konstantina G.
Venue
Biomedicines
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-09
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
97
ISSN
2227-9059 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976060980
Cited by
330
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedicines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trial failure, drug development, prodromal Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, amyloid, tau protein, neurofilament light chain, neurogranin, treatment goals, combination therapy, Bayesian analysis, clinical trial design, trial simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review