Cited by 1,084Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Toward a global understanding of chemical pollution: a first comprehensive analysis of national and regional chemical inventories

Open access
Wang, Zhanyun, Walker, Glen W., Muir, Derek C. G., Nagatani-Yoshida, Kakuko·2020·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Chemicals, while bringing benefits to society, may be released during their lifecycles and possibly cause harm to humans and ecosystems. Chemical pollution has been mentioned as one of the planetary boundaries within which humanity can safely operate, but is not comprehensively understood. Here, 22 chemical inventories from 19 countries and regions are analyzed to achieve a first comprehensive overview of chemicals on the market as an essential first step toward a global understanding of chemical pollution. Over 350 000 chemicals and mixtures of chemicals have been registered for production and use, up to three times as many as previously estimated and with substantial differences across countries/regions. A noteworthy finding is that the identities of many chemicals remain publicly unknown because they are claimed as confidential (over 50 000) or ambiguously described (up to 70 000). Coordinated efforts by all stakeholders including scientists from different disciplines are urgently needed, with (new) areas of interest and opportunities highlighted here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.9b06379

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many chemicals can be quite regionally produced and used.

    “In addition, many chemicals can be quite regionally produced and used (Wang et al., 2020).”

    From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2020

    Section 3.1 finds that almost every country has significant numbers of chemicals registered only in that country, supporting the claim of regional differences. But Section 2.3 says registration may reflect production, import, or use and does not establish that a chemical is currently produced or used there. The evidence therefore does not fully support the claim about regional production and use. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Considering that the world market is estimated to encompass approximately 350,000 chemicals, it is highly likely that the true intrinsic exposure of human fetuses to chemical residues is higher than suggested by studies in Table 1.

    “Considering that the world market is estimated to encompass approximately 350 000 chemicals (Wang et al., 2020), it is highly likely that the true intrinsic exposure of human fetuses to chemical residues is higher than suggested by studies in Table 1.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. ICCA (the International Council of Chemical Associations). "ICCA Review 2010" (2011), pp 1-32. https://icca.cefic.org/ ICCADocs/ICCA-review-2009-2010.pdf.
  2. Rockstrom, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin, F. S., III; Lambin, E. F.; Lenton, T. M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H. J.; Nykvist, B.; de Wit, C. A.; Hughes, T.; van der Leeuw, S.; Rodhe, H.; Sorlin, S.; Snyder, P. K.; Costanza, R.; Svedin, U.; Falkenmark, M.; Karlberg, L.; Corell, R. W.; Fabry, V. J.; Hansen, J.; Walker, B.; Liverman, D.; Richardson, K.; Crutzen, P.; Foley, J. A. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472-475. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockstrom, J.; Cornell, S. E.; Fetzer, I.; Bennett, E. M.; Biggs, R.; Carpenter, S. R.; de Vries, W.; de Wit, C. A.; Folke, C.; Gerten, D.; Heinke, J.; Mace, G. M.; Persson, L. M.; Ramanathan, V.; Reyers, B.; Sorlin, S. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015, 347, 1259855. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Egeghy, P. P.; Judson, R.; Gangwal, S.; Mosher, S.; Smith, D.; Vail, J.; Cohen Hubal, E. A. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 414, 159-166. · DOI
  5. Muir, D. C. G.; Howard, P. H. Are there other persistent organic pollutants? A challenge for environmental chemists. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7157-7166. · DOI
  6. Brown, T. N.; Wania, F. Screening chemicals for the potential to be persistent organic pollutants: A case study of Arctic contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5202-5209. · DOI
  7. Howard, P. H.; Muir, D. C. G. Identifying New Persistent and Bioaccumulative Organics Among Chemicals in Commerce. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2277-2285. · DOI
  8. Scheringer, M.; Strempel, S.; Hukari, S.; Ng, C. A.; Blepp, M.; Hungerbuhler, K. How many persistent organic pollutants should we expect? Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2012, 3, 383-391. · DOI
  9. Strempel, S.; Scheringer, M.; Ng, C. A.; Hungerbuḧler, K. Screening for PBT chemicals among the ″existing″ and "new" chemicals of the EU. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 5680. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Arnot, J. A.; Brown, T. N.; Wania, F.; Breivik, K.; McLachlan, M. S. Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1565-1570. · DOI
  11. Breivik, K.; Arnot, J. A.; Brown, T. N.; McLachlan, M. S.; Wania, F. Screening organic chemicals in commerce for emissions in the context of environmental and human exposure. J. Environ. Monit. 2012, 14, 2028-2037. · DOI
  12. Reppas-Chrysovitsinos, E.; Sobek, A.; MacLeod, M. In Silico Screening-Level Prioritization of 8468 Chemicals Produced in OECD Countries to Identify Potential Planetary Boundary Threats. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2018, 100, 134-146. · DOI
  13. Muir, D.; Zhang, X.; de Wit, C. A.; Vorkamp, K.; Wilson, S. Identifying further chemicals of emerging arctic concern based on "in silico" screening of chemical inventories. Emerging Contaminants. 2019, 5, 201-210. · DOI
  14. Gago-Ferrero, P.; Krettek, A.; Fischer, S.; Wiberg, K.; Ahrens, L. Suspect screening and regulatory databases: a powerful combination to identify emerging micropollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 6881-6894. · DOI
  15. Durig, W.; Troger, R.; Andersson, P. L.; Rybacka, A.; Fischer, S.; Wiberg, K.; Ahrens, L. Development of a suspect screening prioritization tool for organic compounds in water and biota. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 904-912. · DOI
  16. CEFIC (European Chemical Industry Council). Facts and Figures 2011, 2012, pp 1-51, http://www.cefic.org/Documents/ FactsAndFigures/(Offline)%202011/FF2011_Full%20Report_ Chapter/Cefic_FF%20Rapport%202011.pdf.
  17. ICCA, UNEP. Knowledge Management and Information Sharing for the Sound Management of Industrial Chemicals, 2019, pp. 1-208, http://www.saicm.org/Portals/12/Documents/meetings/ OEWG3/inf/OEWG3-INF-28-KMI.pdf.
  18. Williams, A. J.; Grulke, C. M.; Edwards, J.; McEachran, A. D.; Mansouri, K.; Baker, N. C.; Patlewicz, G.; Shah, I.; Wambaugh, J. F.; Judson, R. S.; Richard, A. M. The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry. J. Cheminf. 2017, 9, 61. · DOI
  19. Djoumbou Feunang, Y.; Eisner, R.; Knox, C.; Chepelev, L.; Hastings, J.; Owen, G.; Fahy, E.; Steinbeck, C.; Subramanian, S.; Bolton, E.; Greiner, R.; Wishart, D. S. ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy. J. Cheminf. 2016, 8, 61-20. · DOI
  20. Nerín, C.; Alfaro, P.; Aznar, M.; Domenõ, C. The challenge of identifying non-intentionally added substances from food packaging materials: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 775, 14-24. · DOI
  21. Schymanski, E. L.; Williams, A. J. Open Science for Identifying "Known Unknown" Chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 5357- 5359. · DOI
  22. Schmidt, R.; Ehmki, E. S. R.; Ohm, F.; Ehrlich, H.-C.; Mashychev, A.; Rarey, M. Comparing Molecular Patterns Using the Example of SMARTS: Theory and Algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 2560-2571. · DOI
  23. Luechtefeld, T.; Hartung, T. Computational approaches to chemical hazard assessment. ALTEX. 2017, 34, 459-478. · DOI
  24. Ashford, N. A.; Caldart, C. C. The "right to know": toxics information transfer in the workplace. Annu. Rev. Public Health 1985, 6, 383-401. · DOI
  25. Wilson, M. P.; Schwarzman, M. R. Toward a new U.S. chemicals policy: Rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry, and environmental health. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1202-1209. · DOI
  26. Singh, K.; Oates, C.; Plant, J.; Voulvoulis, N. Undisclosed chemicals-implications for risk assessment: a case study from the mining industry. Environ. Int. 2014, 68, 1-15. · DOI
  27. Furlow, B. US secrecy obscures identities of carcinogenic chemicals. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 118-119. · DOI
  28. Elliott, E. G.; Ettinger, A. S.; Leaderer, B. P.; Bracken, M. B.; Deziel, N. C. A systematic evaluation of chemicals in hydraulic- fracturing fluids and wastewater for reproductive and developmental toxicity. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 90-99. · DOI
  29. Monnery, B. D.; Wright, M.; Cavill, R.; Hoogenboom, R.; Shaunak, S.; Steinke, J. H. G.; Thanou, M. Cytotoxicity of polycations: Relationship of molecular weight and the hydrolytic theory of the mechanism of toxicity. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 521, 249-258. · DOI
  30. Dimitrov, S. D.; Georgieva, D. G.; Pavlov, T. S.; Karakolev, Y. H.; Karamertzanis, P. G.; Rasenberg, M.; Mekenyan, O. G. UVCB substances: methodology for structural description and application to fate and hazard assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2015, 34, 2450- 2462. · DOI
  31. United States Environmental Protection Agency. TSCA Inventory Notification (Active-Inactive) Requirements. Fed. Regist. 2017, 82, 1-25.
  32. Undeman, E.; Fischer, S.; McLachlan, M. S. Evaluation of a novel high throughput screening tool for relative emissions of industrial chemicals used in chemical products. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 996- 1001. · DOI
  33. Wang, Z.; Cousins, I. T.; Scheringer, M.; Buck, R. C.; Hungerbuḧler, K. Global emission inventories for C4-C14 perfluor- oalkyl carboxylic acid (PFCA) homologues from 1951 to 2030, Part I: production and emissions from quantifiable sources. Environ. Int. 2014, 70C, 62-75. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Boucher, J. M.; Cousins, I. T.; Scheringer, M.; Hungerbuḧler, K.; Wang, Z. Toward a Comprehensive Global Emission Inventory of C4- C10 Perfluoroalkanesulfonic Acids (PFSAs) and Related Precursors: Focus on the Life Cycle of C6-and C10-Based Products. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 1-7. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Stieger, G.; Scheringer, M.; Ng, C. A.; Hungerbuḧler, K. Assessing the persistence, bioaccumulation potential and toxicity of brominated flame retardants: data availability and quality for 36 alternative brominated flame retardants. Chemosphere 2014, 116, 118- 123. · DOI
  36. Gustavsson, M. B.; Hellohf, A.; Backhaus, T. Evaluating the environmental hazard of industrial chemicals from data collected during the REACH registration process. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 658-665. · DOI
  37. Backhaus, T.; Scheringer, M.; Wang, Z. Developing SAICM into a framework for the international governance of chemicals throughout their lifecycle: Looking beyond 2020. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2018, 14, 432-433. · DOI
  38. Eltyeb, S.; Salim, N. Chemical named entities recognition: a review on approaches and applications. J. Cheminf. 2014, 6, 17. · DOI
  39. Ellegaard, O.; Wallin, J. A. Identification of environmentally relevant chemicals in bibliographic databases: a comparative analysis. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 255. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Walker, G. W., Muir, D. C. G., & Nagatani-Yoshida, K.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Australian Government (AU)
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
  • United Nations Environment Programme (KE)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhanyun
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2020-01-22
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
2575-2584
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W3000877276
Cited by
1,084
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 198 · 2025: 207 · 2024: 219 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 33
FWCI
42.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
chemical pollution, chemical inventory, chemical registration, chemical mixtures, planetary boundaries
MeSH terms
Environmental Pollution, Humans, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review