The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Automated vehicles represent a technology that promises to increase mobility for many groups, including the senior population (those over age 65) but also for non-drivers and people with medical conditions. This paper estimates bounds on the potential increases in travel in a fully automated vehicle environment due to an increase in mobility from the non-driving and senior populations and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. In addition, these bounding estimates indicate which of these demographics could have the greatest increases in annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and highlight those age groups and genders within these populations that could contribute the most to the VMT increases. The data source is the 2009 National Household Transportation Survey (NHTS), which provides information on travel characteristics of the U.S. population. The changes to light-duty VMT are estimated by creating and examining three possible travel demand wedges. In demand wedge one, non-drivers are assumed to travel as much as the drivers within each age group and gender. Demand wedge two assumes that the driving elderly (those over age 65) without medical conditions will travel as much as a younger population within each gender. Demand wedge three makes the assumption that working age adult drivers (19–64) with medical conditions will travel as much as working age adults without medical conditions within each gender, while the driving elderly with medical any travel-restrictive conditions will travel as much as a younger demographic within each gender in a fully automated vehicle environment. The combination of the results from all three demand wedges represents an upper bound of 295 billion miles or a 14% increase in annual light-duty VMT for the US population 19 and older. Since traveling has other costs besides driving effort, these estimates serve to bound the potential increase from these populations to inform the scope of the challenges, rather than forecast specific VMT scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations
Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 · Cited by 3,214
Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles
Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001 · Cited by 859
Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles
Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2685 · Cited by 419
Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore the Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles
Childress, S., Nichols, B., Charlton, B., & Coe, S. (2015) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2493-11 · Cited by 319
An Analysis of Possible Energy Impacts of Automated Vehicles
Brown, A., Gonder, J., & Repac, B. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Mobility · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05990-7_13 · Cited by 217 · cited 5×
“Vehicle automation has the potential to greatly improve travel by reducing congestion, travel times, crashes, and potentially energy consumption (Anderson et al., 2014; Brown et al., 2014; Harper et al., 2016; Levin and Boyles, 2015; Mersky and Samaras, 2016; Wadud et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351 · Cited by 963
Garrow, L. A., German, B. J., & Leonard, C. E. (2021) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103377 · Cited by 488
Taiebat, M., Brown, A. L., Safford, H. R., Qu, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00127 · Cited by 334
Adnan, N., Md Nordin, S., bin Bahruddin, M. A., & Ali, M. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.019 · Cited by 315
Deb, S., Strawderman, L., Carruth, D. W., DuBien, J., Smith, B., & Garrison, T. M. (2017) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.029 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Harper, C. D., Hendrickson, C. T., Mangones, S., & Samaras, C.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0968-090X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2521151931
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 32.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003
- The paper
- Harper, C. D., Hendrickson, C. T., Mangones, S., & Samaras, C. (2016). Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.