Cited by 422Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

Rocks and clocks: calibrating the Tree of Life using fossils and molecules

Donoghue, Philip C.J., Benton, Michael J.·2007·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

A great tradition in macroevolution and systematics has been the ritual squabbling between palaeontologists and molecular biologists. But, because both sides were talking past each other, they could never agree. Practitioners in both fields should play to their strengths and work together: palaeontologists can provide minimum constraints on branching points in the Tree of Life with considerable precision, and estimate the extent of unrecorded prehistory. Molecular tree analysts have remarkable modelling tools in their armoury to convert multiple minimum age constraints into meaningful dated trees. As we discuss here, work should now focus on establishing reasonable, dated trees that satisfy rigorous assessment of the available fossils and careful consideration of molecular tree methods: rocks and clocks together are an unbeatable combination. Reliably dated trees provide, for the first time, the opportunity to explore wider questions in macroevolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.005

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It may not be possible to produce molecular clocks that can constrain the uncertainty enough to provide any useful information.

    “The effects this variation could have on molecular clocks, together with frequent disagreement between the ages estimated by way of the fossil record and molecular clocks—especially for the most ancient lineages (Hedges et al., 2004; Donoghue and Benton, 2007)—mean that it may not be possible to produce molecular clocks that can constrain the uncertainty enough to provide any useful information.”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Donoghue and Benton, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donoghue, P. C. J., & Benton, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Donoghue, Philip C.J.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
424-431
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100473357
Cited by
413
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C511256/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
divergence time estimation, fossil calibration, phylogenetic tree, macroevolution, systematics
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Calibration, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Molecular Biology, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review