Cited by 93Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfluenza Virus Research StudiesMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

The influence of prebiotic or probiotic supplementation on antibody titers after influenza vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Yeh, Tzu-Lin, Shih, Pei-Ching, Liu, Shu-Jung, Lin, Chao-Hsu, Liu, Jui-Ming, Lei, Wei-Te, Lin, Chien-Yu·2018·Drug Design Development and Therapy

Abstract

Background: Influenza infection is a common disease with a huge disease burden. Influenza vaccination has been widely used, but concerns regarding vaccine efficacy exist, especially in the elderly. Probiotics are live microorganisms with immunomodulatory effects and may enhance the immune responses to influenza vaccination. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the influence of prebiotics/probiotics/synbiotics supplementation on vaccine responses to influenza vaccination. Studies were systematically identified from electronic databases up to July 2017. Information regarding study population, influenza vaccination, components of supplements, and immune responses were extracted and analyzed. Twelve studies, investigating a total of 688 participants, were included in this review. Results: Patients with prebiotics/probiotics supplements were found to have higher influenza hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers after vaccination (for A/H1N1, 42.89 vs 35.76, mean difference =7.14, 95% CI =2.73, 11.55, P =0.002; for A/H3N2, 105.4 vs 88.25, mean difference =17.19, 95% CI =3.39, 30.99, P =0.01; for B strain, 34.87 vs 30.73, mean difference =4.17, 95% CI =0.37, 7.96, P =0.03). Conclusion: Supplementation with prebiotics or probiotics may enhance the influenza hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers in all A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains (20%, 19.5%, and 13.6% increases, respectively). Concomitant prebiotics or probiotics supplementation with influenza vaccination may hold great promise for improving vaccine efficacy. However, high heterogeneity was observed and further studies are warranted. Keywords: influenza, influenza vaccine, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibody titer, immune response

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/dddt.s155110

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a meta-analysis, HI titers were significantly higher for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains, with increases of 20%, 19.5%, and 13.6%, respectively, in the probiotic group compared with the control.

    “In this meta-analysis, researchers reported significantly higher HI titers for both A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains, with increases of 20%, 19.5%, and 13.6%, respectively, in the probiotic group compared with the control.”
  • In a meta-analysis, HI titers were significantly higher in the probiotic group compared to control for influenza A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B, with increases of 20%, 19.5%, and 13.6% respectively.

    “In this meta-analysis the authors found significantly higher HI titers in the probiotic group compared to control for both strain A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and strain B, with increases of 20%, 19.5%, and 13.6% respectively.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Yeh et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [26]Maruyama M Abe R Shimono T Iwabuchi N Abe F Xiao JZ The effects of non-viable Lactobacillus on immune function in the elderly: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Int J Food Sci Nutr 2016 67 1 67 73 26708938
  2. [27]Akatsu H Nagafuchi S Kurihara R Enhanced vaccination effect against influenza by prebiotics in elderly patients receiving enteral nutrition Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016 16 2 205 213 25613751
  3. [28]Nagafuchi S Yamaji T Kawashima A Effects of a formula containing two types of prebiotics, bifidogenic growth stimulator and galactooligosaccharide, and fermented milk products on intestinal microbiota and antibody response to influenza vaccine in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2015 8 2 351 365 26096655 PMC4491666
  4. [29]Lomax AR Cheung LV Noakes PS Miles EA Calder PC Inulin-type beta2–1 fructans have some effect on the antibody response to seasonal influenza vaccination in healthy middle-aged humans Front Immunol 2015 6 490 26441994 PMC4585271
  5. [30]Akatsu H Iwabuchi N Xiao JZ Clinical effects of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on immune function and intestinal microbiota in elderly patients receiving enteral tube feeding JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2013 37 5 631 640 23192454
  6. [31]Akatsu H Arakawa K Yamamoto T Lactobacillus in jelly enhances the effect of influenza vaccination in elderly individuals J Am Geriatr Soc 2013 61 10 1828 1830 24117302
  7. [32]Davidson LE Fiorino AM Snydman DR Hibberd PL Lactobacillus GG as an immune adjuvant for live-attenuated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial Eur J Clin Nutr 2011 65 4 501 507 21285968 PMC3071884
  8. [33]Namba K Hatano M Yaeshima T Takase M Suzuki K Effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 administration on influenza infection, influenza vaccine antibody titer, and cell-mediated immunity in the elderly Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2010 74 5 939 945 20460726
  9. [34]Boge T Remigy M Vaudaine S Tanguy J Bourdet-Sicard R van der Werf S A probiotic fermented dairy drink improves antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly in two randomised controlled trials Vaccine 2009 27 41 5677 5684 19615959
  10. [35]Langkamp-Henken B Wood SM Herlinger-Garcia KA Nutritional formula improved immune profiles of seniors living in nursing homes J Am Geriatr Soc 2006 54 12 1861 1870 17198491
  11. [36]Langkamp-Henken B Bender BS Gardner EM Nutritional formula enhanced immune function and reduced days of symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in seniors J Am Geriatr Soc 2004 52 1 3 12 14687308
  12. [37]Enani S Przemska-Kosicka A Childs CE Impact of ageing and a synbiotic on the immune response to seasonal influenza vaccination; a randomised controlled trial Clin Nutr Epub 2017 1 28 PMC5851674 28215759
  13. [67]Olivares M Diaz-Ropero MP Sierra S Oral intake of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 enhances the effects of influenza vaccination Nutrition 2007 23 3 254 260 17352961
  14. [69]Van Puyenbroeck K Hens N Coenen S Efficacy of daily intake of Lactobacillus casei Shirota on respiratory symptoms and influenza vaccination immune response: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy elderly nursing home residents Am J Clin Nutr 2012 95 5 1165 1171 22440853
  15. [70]Rizzardini G Eskesen D Calder PC Capetti A Jespersen L Clerici M Evaluation of the immune benefits of two probiotic strains Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis, BB-12® and Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei, L. casei 431® in an influenza vaccination model: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Br J Nutr 2012 107 6 876 884 21899798
  16. [71]Bosch M Méndez M Pérez M Farran A Fuentes MC Cuñé J Lactobacillus plantarum CECT7315 and CECT7316 stimulate immunoglobulin production after influenza vaccination in elderly Nutr Hosp 2012 27 2 504 509 22732975
  17. [72]Jespersen L Tarnow I Eskesen D Effect of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, L. casei 431 on immune response to influenza vaccination and upper respiratory tract infections in healthy adult volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study Am J Clin Nutr 2015 101 6 1188 1196 25926507
  18. [73]Bunout D Hirsch S Pía de la Maza M Effects of prebiotics on the immune response to vaccination in the elderly J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002 26 6 372 376 12405649

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeh, T.-L., Shih, P.-C., Liu, S.-J., Lin, C.-H., Liu, J.-M., Lei, W.-T., & Lin, C.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR)
Corresponding author
Lin, Chien-Yu
Venue
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Published
2018-01
Volume
Volume 12
Pages
217-230
ISSN
1177-8881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790466811
Cited by
93
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Design Development and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
influenza vaccination, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibody titers, hemagglutination inhibition, vaccine response, immunomodulation, older adults, H1N1, H3N2, influenza B
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Formation, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review