Cited by 46Dermatological diseases and infestationsHelminth infection and controlVector-borne infectious diseases

Effects of orally administered spinosad (Comfortis®) in dogs on adult and immature stages of the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis)

Blagburn, Byron L., Young, David R., Moran, Columba, Meyer, Jeffery A., Leigh-Heffron, Anna, Paarlberg, Tandy, Zimmermann, Alan G., Mowrey, Daniel +2 more·2010·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

The efficacy of spinosad against adult fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) on dogs was evaluated in three controlled, blinded studies. One study was conducted to determine speed of kill on experimentally infested dogs. Two additional studies were designed to assess the efficacy of spinosad in preventing environmental contamination with flea eggs (USA study and EU study). An additional objective of the USA study was to assess the effects of skin and hair-coat debris from spinosad-treated dogs on eggs and larvae of C. felis. Dogs were randomly allocated to treatment with beef-flavored spinosad tablets, administered orally at a minimum dosage of 30mg/kg, or placebo. In the first study, speed of kill was determined by flea comb counts performed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48h after spinosad treatment. Reductions in geometric mean flea counts for spinosad-treated dogs, compared to placebo were 53.7% at 0.5h, 64.2% at 1h, 85.8% at 2h and 100% at 4 through 48h post-treatment (p<0.05 at 1h and beyond). In the 2 flea egg production studies, dogs were treated (spinosad or placebo) once on day 0, infested with 600 fleas approximately 3h post-treatment and reinfested with approximately 600 fleas at intervals over 1 month. Flea eggs were collected starting at approximately 72h after each infestation. Eggs were examined for any effects of spinosad on egg viability. Efficacy of spinosad was also evaluated against environmental eggs and larvae exposed to canine hair-coat debris collected on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30. Spinosad was highly effective in reducing flea egg production (>99.8% across the entire study period) compared to control dogs in both egg collection studies. Insufficient numbers of eggs were recovered from spinosad-treated dogs to determine the viability of those eggs. There was no evidence of any effect on environmental flea stages, indicating that spinosad was not present in the skin debris of spinosad-treated dogs. The capability of spinosad to quickly kill adult fleas, and to greatly reduce egg production following challenge with high numbers of adult fleas is important in breaking the flea life cycle and preventing the introduction and establishment of new flea infestations in the household.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.023

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Larvicidal effects of imidacloprid are of practical significance in both breaking the flea life cycle and reducing the level of flea infestation in the domestic environment; spinosad and selamectin reduce egg production; selamectin has ovicidal effects impairing larval emergence.

    “Larvicidal effects of imidacloprid is of practical significance in both breaking the flea life cycle and reducing the level of flea infestation in the domestic environment, spinosad and selamectin reduce egg production, and the latter has ovicidal effects impairing larval emergence [106,111,112,121].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blagburn, B. L., Young, D. R., Moran, C., Meyer, J. A., Leigh-Heffron, A., Paarlberg, T., Zimmermann, A. G., Mowrey, D., Wiseman, S., & Snyder, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Daniel E.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
168
Issue
3-4
Pages
312-317
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090219325
Cited by
46
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
spinosad, Ctenocephalides felis, speed of kill, environmental contamination, flea larvae
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Drug Combinations, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Female, Siphonaptera, Insecticides, Male, Parasite Egg Count, Random Allocation, Macrolides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review