Assessment of owner-administered monthly treatments with oral spinosad or topical spot-on fipronil/(S)-methoprene in controlling fleas and associated pruritus in dogs
Abstract
Monitoring of the performance of flea control products under conditions of natural challenge is valuable in assessing continued effectiveness and determining the ongoing relevance of laboratory studies. A multi-clinic, investigator-blinded study was undertaken in client-owned dogs to investigate and compare the flea control provided by 3 consecutive monthly treatments of oral spinosad (SPN) or fipronil/(S)-methoprene topical (FSM) spot-on. The first household dog meeting enrollment criteria and with at least 10 fleas (whole-body flea count) served as the index dog in a household against which primary objectives were set. Stratification was based on pruritus scores at the enrollment visit and on single or multiple pet household. Index pets were randomized to treatment with either SPN or FSM, dispensed on day 0 for at-home administration by owners. All other household dogs and cats, maximum 4 pets per household, were dispensed the same treatment as the index dog (spinetoram was dispensed for cats in SPN households). Subsequent treatments were dispensed when index dogs were returned for whole-body flea counts and pruritus-scoring at visits on days 30 and 60, with final assessments on day 90 (±5 days on each occasion). Primary endpoints were the number of flea-free index dogs in each group one month after the final treatment, the reduction in owner-reported pruritus, and the reduction from baseline mean flea counts. One hundred twenty eight index dogs were enrolled (65 in the SPN arm; 63 in the FSM arm) at 10 clinics in FL (6), NC (2), LA (1), and TX (1). On day 0, geometric mean flea counts were 57.7 (range: 10-1469) and 44.8 (10-717) for the SPN and FSM groups, respectively. On Day 90, 55 of 58 (95%) and 21 of 55 (38%) index dogs completing the study were flea-free in SPN and FSM groups, respectively; mean SPN pruritus scores declined to 0.92 (6.67 on day 0), and to 3.83 (6.33 on day 0) for FSM; geometric mean flea counts (% control) were 0.08 (99.9%) and 5.19 (88.4%), for SPN and FSM groups, respectively. Between-treatment differences were highly statistically significant (p<0.0001). In conclusion, SPN provided reliable flea control in client-owned dogs, regardless of challenge level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The susceptibility of the KS1 strain to different formulations at varying regimens is clear evidence of the efficacy of compounds presently marketed in controlling pulicosis for about an entire month.
“However, the susceptibility of this strain to different formulations at varying regimens (e.g. lufenuron, spinosad, imidacloprid + moxidectin, selamectin and others out of the scope of this review) is clear evidence of the efficacy of compounds presently marketed in controlling pulicosis for about an entire month [135,146,179,180].”
From Fleas infesting pets in the era of emerging extra-intestinal nematodes (2013) · cites this paper as [180]
Cites
Further validation of a pruritus severity scale for use in dogs
Rybníček, J., Lau‐Gillard, P., Harvey, R. G., et al. (2008) · Veterinary Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00728.x · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Dryden, M. W., Denenberg, T. M., & Bunch, S. (2000) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00318-6 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationSnyder, D. E., Meyer, J. A., Zimmermann, A. G., Qiao, M., Gissendanner, S. J., Cruthers, L. R., Slone, R. L., & Young, D. R. (2007) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.09.011 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationMehlhorn, H., Mencke, N., & Hansen, O. (1999) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s004360050607 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Robertson-Plouch, C. K., Baker, K. A., Hozak, R. R., Zimmermann, A. G., Parks, S., Herr, C., Hart, L. M., Jay, J., Hutchens, D. E., & Snyder, D. E. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationBlagburn, B. L., Young, D. R., Moran, C., Meyer, J. A., Leigh-Heffron, A., Paarlberg, T., Zimmermann, A. G., Mowrey, D., Wiseman, S., & Snyder, D. E. (2010) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.023 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationCochet, P., Birckel, P., Bromet-Petit, M., et al. (1997) · European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/bf03189809 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Dryden, M. W., Payne, P. A., Smith, V., et al. (2011) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.054 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationFranc, M., & Bouhsira, E. (2009) · Parasite · doi:10.1051/parasite/2009162125 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Evaluation of spinosad for the oral treatment and control of flea infestations on dogs in Europe
Wolken, S., Franc, M., Bouhsira, E., Wiseman, S., Hayes, B., Schnitzler, B., & Jacobs, D. E. (2012) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.100211 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Dryden, M. W., Payne, P. A., Smith, V., & Kobuszewski, D. (2011) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationBeugnet, F., Doyle, V., Murray, M., & Chalvet-Monfray, K. (2011) · Parasite · doi:10.1051/parasite/2011184325 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fleas infesting pets in the era of emerging extra-intestinal nematodes
Traversa, D. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-59 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dryden, M. W., Ryan, W. G., Bell, M., Rumschlag, A. J., Young, L. M., & Snyder, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Elanco (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Snyder, Daniel E.
- Venue
- Veterinary Parasitology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 340-346
- ISSN
- 0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995739811
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Keywords
- spinosad, flea control, pruritus, dogs, spinetoram, natural challenge
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Communicable Disease Control, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Drug Combinations, Female, Siphonaptera, Male, Methoprene, Pruritus, Pyrazoles, Macrolides, Flea Infestations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review