Cited by 18Dermatological diseases and infestationsHelminth infection and controlInsect Pest Control Strategies

Comparative efficacy on dogs of a single topical treatment with the pioneer fipronil/(S)-methoprene and an oral treatment with spinosad against Ctenocephalides felis

Open access
Beugnet, F., Doyle, V., Murray, M., Chalvet-Monfray, K.·2011·Parasite

Abstract

In the study reported here, the pioneer fipronil/(S)-methoprene topical product (Frontline® Plus, Merial Limited, Duluth, GA) was compared to the oral spinosad product (Comfortis® Elanco, Greenfield, IN) for efficacy against adult fleas and preventing egg production. The product presentations, doses and labelling were the one applicable in the USA. Using a standard protocol, 200 cat fleas of mixed sex were applied to dogs on Days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Dogs were combed to remove fleas 24 hours post-infestation, the fleas were counted, collected, and then reapplied to each dog following completion of their respective count. At 48 hours post-infestation, comb counts were performed and fleas were removed. No fleas were collected from any dog in the fipronil/(S)-methoprene group at any 24 or 48 hours post-infestation assessment throughout the six weeks study, yielding a preventive efficacy of 100%. For the spinosad treatment, efficacy was 100% at 24 hours and 48 hours through Day 16, and thereafter declined. The results observed in the spinosad-treated dogs were highly variable between animals. At the 24 and 48 hours counts following the Day 21 infestation, only five of eight spinosad-treated dogs (62.5%) were flea-free. Following the Day 28 infestation, spinosad efficacy fell to 85% and 89%, for the 24 hours and 48 hours counts, and only two dogs (25%) were flea free, compared to 100% flea-free dogs in the fipronil/(S)-methoprene group. No fleas were collected from the fipronil/(S)-methoprene treated dogs throughout the entire study, therefore, no eggs were collected at any time from any dog in the group. However, in the spinosad group adult fleas were found on dogs starting on Day 21 and by Day 30, 42 eggs were collected from one dog that had 107 adult fleas counted at 48 hours. At Day 37 and Day 49, more than 100 eggs were collected from each dog in the spinosad-treated and control groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/parasite/2011184325

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most insecticides may suffer from decreasing levels of killing speed throughout the month following administration.

    “Given that most insecticides may suffer from decreasing levels of killing speed throughout the month following administration [105,106,123,124], environmental control is mandatory.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Blagburn B.L., Cruthers L., Ketzis J., Arther R., Davis W., Schroeder I., Settje T. & Butler J.M.. Comparative efficacy of Advantage® Topical solution (imidacloprid) and Comfortis® Chewable Tablets (spinosad) for the control of fleas on dogs. Proceedings AAVP, 55th Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, 2010, p. 49
  2. Dryden M., Payne P., Smith V., Mcbride A. & Ritchie D. Efficacy of topically applied dinotefuran formulations and orally administrered spinosad tablets against KS1 flea strain infesting dogs. Proceedings AAVP, 55th Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, 2010, p. 51
  3. Franc M. & Cadiergues M.C. Utilisation du lufénuron dans le contrôle des infestations du chien par Ctenocpehalides felis. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, 1995, 146, 481– 484
  4. Franc M., Choquart P. & Cadiergues M.C. Répartition des espèces de puces rencontrées chez le chien en France. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, 1998, 149, 135– 140

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beugnet, F., Doyle, V., Murray, M., & Chalvet-Monfray, K.
Corresponding author
Beugnet, F.
Venue
Parasite
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2011-11
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
325-331
ISSN
  • 1252-607X (ISSN-L)
  • 1776-1042
OpenAlex
W2106921990
Cited by
18
References
22
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Parasite (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
Ctenocephalides felis, flea control, spinosad, dogs, drug efficacy comparison, flea infestation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Administration, Topical, Animals, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Drug Combinations, Female, Insecticides, Juvenile Hormones, Male, Methoprene, Parasite Egg Count, Pyrazoles, Macrolides, Ctenocephalides, Flea Infestations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review