Cited by 48Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens in dog and cat: A questionnaire study in Italy

Genchi, Marco, Rinaldi, Laura, Venco, Luigi, Cringoli, Giuseppe, Vismarra, Alice, Kramer, Laura·2019·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens are vector-borne parasites of dogs and cats, with zoonotic potential, endemic in many parts of Europe, including Italy. Control and prevention of dirofilariosis are essential points to reduce their diffusion in animals and humans and veterinarians are the main subjects involved in this "battle". With the aim to better understand current practice by veterinarians, an online questionnaire on different aspects of D. immitis and D. repens was sent to companion animal veterinary facilities registered with the Italian Veterinary chamber. The overall response rate was 25%. Approximately 47% had diagnosed at least one case of Dirofilaria spp. in dogs in the last year and approximately 6% had diagnosed at least one case of Dirofilaria spp. in cats. Of the 662 facilities surveyed, 83.8% used serology to diagnose heartworm infection. For the diagnosis of D. repens infection in dogs and cats, a high percentage of facilities relied on an external laboratory. Most recommended beginning prevention of canine heartworm disease in April-May. Topical and injectable moxidectin and oral ivermectin were the two most commonly used preventives for D. immitis in dogs. The drug most commonly used for heartworm adulticide treatment in dogs was melarsomine. This study show that veterinary facilities ians working in an endemic area for D. immitis and D. repens are aware of recent developments in adulticide therapy. Results would suggest however that diagnosis is not always carried out according to what is currently recommended by international guidelines and that the timing for starting prevention may not be optimal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.01.014

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genchi, M., Rinaldi, L., Venco, L., Cringoli, G., Vismarra, A., & Kramer, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Genchi, Marco
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
267
Pages
26-31
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912891654
Cited by
48
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, canine heartworm disease, feline heartworm disease, dirofilariasis, heartworm prevention, serology, moxidectin, ivermectin, melarsomine, veterinary practice, Italy
MeSH terms
Mosquito Vectors, Animals, Antinematodal Agents, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Hospitals, Animal, Italy, Ivermectin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Veterinarians, Macrolides, Dirofilaria repens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review