Cited by 7Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Design and Development

Consumer Perceptions of Product Lifetimes and Labelling: Implications for Introducing a Durability Label

Open access
Milios, Leonidas, Dalhammar, Carl·2023·Journal of Circular Economy

Abstract

Extending the lifetime of products enables material resource savings and provides an effective resource efficiency strategy within a circular economy paradigm. Although consumer demand for longer lasting products that can be easily repaired has been on the rise, it is not certain that consumers are fully able to identify such products and willing to pay a premium for them. France introduced a mandatory product repairability index in 2021 and plans to introduce a mandatory product durability index by 2024. The reasoning was to allow consumers to benchmark products, and to provide incentives for manufacturers to design durable and repairable products. This initiative would most likely speed up activities for developing a harmonised European Union (EU) labelling scheme to avoid the possibility that various EU countries start their own schemes, which could be problematic for business within the EU single market. However, there is uncertainty regarding how to best display a durability label for influencing consumer choice. This contribution reviews the literature on product durability information and labelling, addressing consumer perceptions on durability labelling and whetherthe provision of durability information is taken into account in purchasing decisions. Potential implications in durability labelling implementation are discussed, concluding the article with suggestions for overcoming potential implementation challenges.

Verified 2026-10-28 · 22 references not checked yet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.55845/ahfr5526

Cites

49 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 7 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

29 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.010 · DOI
  2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.119 · DOI · Paper page
  3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1273813 · DOI
  4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9397-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milios, L., & Dalhammar, C.
Venue
Journal of Circular Economy
Publisher
DSRPT GbR
Published
2023-03-23
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2752-163X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4352986101
Cited by
7
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circular Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
product durability, consumer perception, product lifetime, purchase decision, consumer willingness to pay, resource efficiency, product design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review