The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium-ion batteries using organic acids: Process optimization and kinetic aspects
Open accessAbstract
An environmentally-friendly route based on hydrometallurgy was investigated for the recovery of cobalt and lithium from spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) using different organic acids (citric acid, Dl-malic acid, oxalic acid and acetic acid). In this investigation, response surface methodology (RSM) was utilized to optimize leaching parameters including solid to liquid ratio (S/L), temperature, acid concentration, type of organic acid and hydrogen peroxide concentration. Based on the results obtained from optimizing procedure, temperature was recognized as the most influential parameter. In addition, while 81% of cobalt was recovered, the maximum lithium recovery of 92% was achieved at the optimum leaching condition of 60°C, S/L: 30gL-1, citric acid concentration: 2M, hydrogen peroxide concentration: 1.25Vol.% and leaching time: 2h. Furthermore, results displayed that ultrasonic agitation will enhance the recovery of lithium and cobalt. It was found that the kinetics of cobalt leaching is controlled by surface chemical reaction at temperatures lower than 45°C. However, diffusion through the product layer at temperatures higher than 45°C controls the rate of cobalt leaching. Rate of lithium reaction is controlled by diffusion through the product layer at all the temperatures studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levenspiel, O. (1999) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie990488g · Cited by 9,970
Fundamentals of analytical chemistry
Skoog, D. A. (1963) · Cited by 2,234
Design and Analysis of Experiments
(2007) · Modern Engineering Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470187548.ch12 · Cited by 1,424
Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry
(2000) · Fundamentals of Environmental Chemistry, Second Edition · doi:10.1201/9781420056716.ch25 · Cited by 992
Development of a recycling process for Li-ion batteries
Georgi-Maschler, T., Friedrich, B., Weyhe, R., Heegn, H., & Rutz, M. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.152 · Cited by 836
A review of processes and technologies for the recycling of lithium-ion secondary batteries
Xu, J., Thomas, H. R., Francis, R. W., Lum, K. R., Wang, J., & Liang, B. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.074 · Cited by 810
Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries
Ordoñez, J., Gago, E. J., & Girard, A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.363 · Cited by 694
Li, L., Ge, J., Wu, F., Chen, R., Chen, S., & Wu, B. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.026 · Cited by 647
Ionisation constants of organic acids in aqueous solution
Serjeant, E. P., & Dempsey, B. (1979) · Pergamon Press eBooks · Cited by 589
Li, L., Dunn, J. B., Zhang, X. X., Gaines, L., Chen, R. J., Wu, F., & Amine, K. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.089 · Cited by 563
Cited by
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments
Armand, M., Axmann, P., Bresser, D., Copley, M., Edström, K., Ekberg, C., Guyomard, D., Lestriez, B., Novák, P., Petranikova, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708 · Cited by 888
Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in view of lithium recovery: A critical review
Liu, C., Lin, J., Cao, H., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.304 · Cited by 789
Mossali, E., Picone, N., Gentilini, L., Rodrìguez, O., Pérez, J. M., & Colledani, M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110500 · Cited by 574
Or, T., Gourley, S. W. D., Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.29 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Golmohammadzadeh, R., Rashchi, F., & Vahidi, E.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 244-254
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2602139987
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 18.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium-ion batteries using organic acids: Process optimization and kinetic aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.037
- The paper
- Golmohammadzadeh, R., Rashchi, F., & Vahidi, E. (2017). Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium-ion batteries using organic acids: Process optimization and kinetic aspects. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.