The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable Recovery of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Lactic Acid Leaching System
Abstract
An environmentally friendly leaching process for recycling valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries is developed. A sol–gel method is utilized to resynthesize LiNi 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 O 2 from the leachate. Lactic acid is chosen as a leaching and chelating agent. The leaching efficiency is investigated by determining the contents of metal elements such as Li, Ni, Co, and Mn in the leachate using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy. The spent cathode materials for the pretreatment process and the regenerated and freshly synthesized materials are examined using X-ray diffraction and scanning electronic microscopy. The results show that the leaching efficiencies of Li, Ni, Co, and Mn reached 97.7, 98.2, 98.9, and 98.4%, respectively. The optimum conditions are lactic acid concentration of 1.5 mol L –1, solid/liquid ratio of 20 g L –1, leaching temperature of 70 °C, H 2 O 2 content of 0.5 vol %, and reaction time of 20 min. The leaching kinetics of cathode scrap in lactic acid fit well to the Avrami equation. Electrochemical analysis indicate that the regenerated LiNi 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 O 2 cathode materials deliver a highly reversible discharge capacity, 138.2 mA h g –1, at 0.5 C after 100 cycles, with a capacity retention of 96%, comparable to those of freshly synthesized LiNi 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 O 2 cathodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Sun, L., & Qiu, K. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.114 · Cited by 493
Mishra, D., Kim, D.-J., Ralph, D. E., Ahn, J.-G., & Rhee, Y.-H. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.010 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles
Harper, G., Sommerville, R., Kendrick, E., Driscoll, L., Slater, P., Stolkin, R., Walton, A., Christensen, P., Heidrich, O., Lambert, S., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5 · Cited by 3,890
Recycling End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries
Chen, M., Ma, X., Chen, B., Arsenault, R., Karlson, P., Simon, N., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.014 · Cited by 1,316
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationNeumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Mossali, E., Picone, N., Gentilini, L., Rodrìguez, O., Pérez, J. M., & Colledani, M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110500 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Fan, E., Guan, Y., Zhang, X., Xue, Q., Wei, L., Wu, F., & Chen, R.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-05-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5224-5233
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611438716
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable Recovery of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Lactic Acid Leaching System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00571
- The paper
- Li, L., Fan, E., Guan, Y., Zhang, X., Xue, Q., Wei, L., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2017). Sustainable Recovery of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Lactic Acid Leaching System. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.