Cited by 47Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesPhonetics and Phonology ResearchSpeech and dialogue systems

Turn-end Estimation in Conversational Turn-taking: The Roles of Context and Prosody

Open access
Bögels, Sara, Torreira, Francisco·2021·Discourse Processes

Abstract

This study investigated the role of contextual and prosodic information in turn-end estimation by means of a button-press task. We presented participants with turns extracted from a corpus of telephone calls visually (i.e., in transcribed form, word-by-word) and auditorily, and asked them to anticipate turn ends by pressing a button. The availability of the previous conversational context was generally helpful for turn-end estimation in short turns only, and more clearly so in the visual task than in the auditory task. To investigate the role of prosody, we examined whether participants in the auditory task pressed the button close to turn-medial points likely to constitute turn ends based on lexico-syntactic information alone. We observed that the vast majority of such button presses occurred in the presence of an intonational boundary rather than in its absence. These results are consistent with the view that prosodic cues in the proximity of turn ends play a relevant role in turn-end estimation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0163853x.2021.1986664

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other laboratory studies have demonstrated that listeners can use semantic information and the discourse context to predict ends of turns.

    “Other laboratory studies have demonstrated that listeners can use semantic information and the discourse context to predict ends of turns”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Bögels & Torreira, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bögels, S., & Torreira, F.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
Corresponding author
Bögels, Sara
Venue
Discourse Processes
Published
2021-10-18
Volume
58
Issue
10
Pages
903-924
ISSN
  • 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6950
OpenAlex
W3208708812
Cited by
47
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
14.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Discourse Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Max Planck Instituut voor Psycholinguïstiek
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (269484)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
turn-taking, conversational context, prosody, telephone conversation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review