Turn-end Estimation in Conversational Turn-taking: The Roles of Context and Prosody
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the role of contextual and prosodic information in turn-end estimation by means of a button-press task. We presented participants with turns extracted from a corpus of telephone calls visually (i.e., in transcribed form, word-by-word) and auditorily, and asked them to anticipate turn ends by pressing a button. The availability of the previous conversational context was generally helpful for turn-end estimation in short turns only, and more clearly so in the visual task than in the auditory task. To investigate the role of prosody, we examined whether participants in the auditory task pressed the button close to turn-medial points likely to constitute turn ends based on lexico-syntactic information alone. We observed that the vast majority of such button presses occurred in the presence of an intonational boundary rather than in its absence. These results are consistent with the view that prosodic cues in the proximity of turn ends play a relevant role in turn-end estimation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other laboratory studies have demonstrated that listeners can use semantic information and the discourse context to predict ends of turns.
“Other laboratory studies have demonstrated that listeners can use semantic information and the discourse context to predict ends of turns”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Bögels & Torreira, 2021
Cites
Early Anticipation Lies behind the Speed of Response in Conversation
Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., de Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00673 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction
Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation
Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12881 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationVariation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking
Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…turn in conversation involves at least two complex processes, namely (1) planning the content of one’s next turn (e.g., Barthel et al., 2016; Bögels, Magyari et al., 2015; Sjerps & Meyer, 2015) and (2) estimating the end of the ongoing turn so as to be able to produce one’s turn in a timely manner.”
BackgroundBarthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Never Say No … How the Brain Interprets the Pregnant Pause in Conversation
Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145474 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationSpeakers advance-project turn completion by slowing down: A multifactorial corpus analysis
Rühlemann, C., & Gries, S. T. (2020) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100976 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meyer, A. S. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.268 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bögels, S., & Torreira, F.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bögels, Sara
- ORCID
- Bögels, Sara
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-10-18
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 903-924
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W3208708812
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 14.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Discourse Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Max Planck Instituut voor Psycholinguïstiek
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (269484)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- turn-taking, conversational context, prosody, telephone conversation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review