Cited by 19Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Women’s experiences of early pregnancy loss services during the pandemic: A qualitative investigation

Open access
George-Carey, Rhiannon, Memtsa, Maria, Kent-Nye, Flora E., Magee, Laura A., Oza, Munira, Burgess, Karen, Goodhart, Venetia, Jurković, Davor +1 more·2024·Women and Birth

Abstract

PROBLEM: Early pregnancy losses [EPL] are common, varied, and require different courses of management and care. BACKGROUND: In the UK, women who suspect or suffer a pregnancy loss are usually provided specialist care in early pregnancy assessment units [EPAUs]. Their configuration has recently been evaluated, but recommendations for change in-line with best practice for optimum outcomes were unable to be implemented due to the COVID-19 pandemic health system shock. AIM: To compare women's experiences of EPAUs during the pandemic to themes previously found in qualitative work undertaken with women who utilised EPAUs before the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured virtual interviews, with women (N = 32) who suffered an early pregnancy loss during the pandemic; analysing transcripts using Template Analysis, based on findings about women's (pre-pandemic) experiences of EPAU from The VESPA Study. FINDINGS: We report on seven key themes: Barriers to Accessing Services; Communication & Information; Retention of Relational Care; Involvement in Care Decisions; Staffs' Attitude or Approach; Efficiency of Service Delivery; Sensitive Patient Management. DISCUSSION: Sensitive patient management and woman-staff interactions in EPAU settings remain a fundamental issue. Women also reported their experiences of EPAUs were comparatively worse during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Women valued the care provided by EPAUs and found services to be efficient, despite pandemic-related restrictions. However, psychological recognition surrounding EPL and appropriate, sensitive, relational care and support continue to be areas in need of improvement. Our recommendation is to implement the improvements suggested by VESPA as a priority to ameliorate present sub-optimal experiences and prevent further deterioration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.12.004

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major changes in healthcare services, such as cancellation of appointments and exams, and restrictions on contact with the baby after death, further intensified women's suffering during the pandemic.

    “Major changes in healthcare services, such as the cancellation of appointments and exams (56), and restrictions on contact with the baby after death, further intensified women’s suffering during this period (57, 58).”

    From Experiences and long-term repercussions of perinatal grief in women after perinatal bereavement: a meta-ethnography (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Discussion (p. 9) reports that women’s experiences of early pregnancy loss services deteriorated during the pandemic and says some deterioration could be linked to pandemic restrictions. The paper does not report restrictions on contact with a baby after death or link that specific restriction to women’s suffering. The cancellation of appointments and exams is cited separately to reference 56, not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11][11] M.J. McIntosh, J.M. Morse, Situating and constructing diversity in semistructured interviews, Glob. Qual. Nurs. Res 2 (2015) 1 -12, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2333393615597674. -
  2. [18][18] [Z. Clark-Coates, S. Collinge, The Independent Pregnancy Loss Review -Care and support when baby loss occurs before 24 weeks gestation, The Department of Health and Social Care, UK Goverment, London, 2023.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1871-5192(23)00315-3/sbref16) -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George-Carey, R., Memtsa, M., Kent-Nye, F. E., Magee, L. A., Oza, M., Burgess, K., Goodhart, V., Jurković, D., & Silverio, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The Ectopic Pregnancy Trust (GB)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Silverio, Sergio A.
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
394-402
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390617251
Cited by
19
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration South London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Keywords
early pregnancy loss, COVID-19 pandemic, women's experiences of care, relational care, staff-patient communication, service delivery efficiency
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review